5 / 1Welcome to /sci/ - Science & MathThe new /sci/ wiki
https://4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki
(More resources in replies)
https://4chan-science.fandom.com/wi
(More resources in replies)
80 / 68ITT: Post elegant and intuitive ways of visualizing/understanding subject matter. I'll start off with a few.
85 / 10/scg/ - stem career generalit's over everything is fucked edition
Previous Thread: >>>16792899
This thread exists to ask questions regarding careers associated to STEM.
>Discussion on academia-based career progression
>Discussion on penetrating industry from academia
>Or anything in relation to STEM employment or development within STEM academia!
>If you have a question, before posting, read some of the older posts and ,if you can, try to answer their questions on your post. That way the thread isn't an endless log of unanswered questions.
Resources for protecting yourself from academic marxists:
>https://www.thefire.org/ (US)
>https://www.jccf.ca/ (Canada)
Information resource:
>https://sciencecareergeneral.neocities.org/
>*The Chad author is seeking additional input to diversify the content into containing all STEM fields. Said author regularly views these /scg/ threads.
No anons have answered your question? Perhaps try posting it here:
>https://academia.stackexchange.com/
An archive of some of the previous editions of /scg/:
http://warosu.org/sci/thread/15740454
Previous Thread: >>>16792899
This thread exists to ask questions regarding careers associated to STEM.
>Discussion on academia-based career progression
>Discussion on penetrating industry from academia
>Or anything in relation to STEM employment or development within STEM academia!
>If you have a question, before posting, read some of the older posts and ,if you can, try to answer their questions on your post. That way the thread isn't an endless log of unanswered questions.
Resources for protecting yourself from academic marxists:
>https://www.thefire.org/ (US)
>https://www.jccf.ca/ (Canada)
Information resource:
>https://sciencecareergeneral.neoci
>*The Chad author is seeking additional input to diversify the content into containing all STEM fields. Said author regularly views these /scg/ threads.
No anons have answered your question? Perhaps try posting it here:
>https://academia.stackexchange.com
An archive of some of the previous editions of /scg/:
http://warosu.org/sci/thread/157404
25 / 1why is division by zero undefined rather than indeterminate? is it purely historical or is there a reason:
>this expression is valid, but there is nothing that satisfies it
doesn't work here?
>this expression is valid, but there is nothing that satisfies it
doesn't work here?
36 / 21137.035999 Fine-Structure Constanthttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant
137.035999
>In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as the Sommerfeld constant, commonly denoted by α alpha (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant that quantifies the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. It is a dimensionless quantity (dimensionless physical constant), independent of the system of units used, which is related to the strength of the coupling of an elementary charge e with the electromagnetic field
WTF is this number? Is it important? What does it measure?
Can you show me a .webm of this in actual physical reality or is it just more madeup nerd slop like "Ether" and "Dark Matter" and "Black Energy"?
137.035999
>In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as the Sommerfeld constant, commonly denoted by α alpha (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant that quantifies the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles. It is a dimensionless quantity (dimensionless physical constant), independent of the system of units used, which is related to the strength of the coupling of an elementary charge e with the electromagnetic field
WTF is this number? Is it important? What does it measure?
Can you show me a .webm of this in actual physical reality or is it just more madeup nerd slop like "Ether" and "Dark Matter" and "Black Energy"?
45 / 4PhD David Deutsch is sure mwi is truePhD David Deutsch says he's as sure many worlds interpretation is correct as he is that evolution is correct. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bux0SjaUCY0
Is he right to be so confident the many worlds interpretation is true?
Is he right to be so confident the many worlds interpretation is true?
27 / 7MOCHIZUKI BTFO'S POP JOURNALISTA pop-science journalist known as James Douglas Boyd has recently spent a lot of time interacting with Mochizuki and others at RIMS working in anabelian geometry. He published his interviews with Mochizuki a few weeks ago.
However, esteemed Professor Mochizuki Shinichi is NOT AT ALL happy with the results, writing
>It is difficult for me to recall any time in my career as a mathematician when I experienced a comparable level of overt fraud/duplicity/charlatanism in a professional situation, and it has left me in a state of [math]\textit{deep shock}[/math].
https://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/IUT-report-2025-10.pdf
In particular, he claims the J.D. Boyd he interacted with was "nothing more than a cynical work of fiction" (see pic rel).
Mochizuki further emphasizes EMS Code of Practice (EMSCOP) and argues journalism/story-telling (and some preprints) lack the professional accountability apparatus of peer-reviewed mathematics. Boyd’s work violates prior assurances and democratic norms (rule of law, due process, burden of proof).
He then comments on the Scholze-Stix (SS) manuscript:
- The SS manuscript is unpublished, contains no precise statement or proof relating its simplified set-up to IUT
- SS declined further discussion after 2018; calls it a “mystery” why anyone asserts a logical relationship between their simplification and IUT
- SS explicitly did not contest IUT’s multiradial representation (IUT III, Thm 3.11); rather, they claimed no path to diophantine consequences.
However, esteemed Professor Mochizuki Shinichi is NOT AT ALL happy with the results, writing
>It is difficult for me to recall any time in my career as a mathematician when I experienced a comparable level of overt fraud/duplicity/charlatanism in a professional situation, and it has left me in a state of [math]\textit{deep shock}[/math].
https://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~m
In particular, he claims the J.D. Boyd he interacted with was "nothing more than a cynical work of fiction" (see pic rel).
Mochizuki further emphasizes EMS Code of Practice (EMSCOP) and argues journalism/story-telling (and some preprints) lack the professional accountability apparatus of peer-reviewed mathematics. Boyd’s work violates prior assurances and democratic norms (rule of law, due process, burden of proof).
He then comments on the Scholze-Stix (SS) manuscript:
- The SS manuscript is unpublished, contains no precise statement or proof relating its simplified set-up to IUT
- SS declined further discussion after 2018; calls it a “mystery” why anyone asserts a logical relationship between their simplification and IUT
- SS explicitly did not contest IUT’s multiradial representation (IUT III, Thm 3.11); rather, they claimed no path to diophantine consequences.
89 / 9Why do you not want to get a PhD?
>Higher earning potential
>Produce a novel contribution to your field
>Prove you can do research, problem solve etc which are valuable skills employers are looking for
>Higher earning potential
>Produce a novel contribution to your field
>Prove you can do research, problem solve etc which are valuable skills employers are looking for
13 / 2I hate to Twitterpost but isn't this completely wrong? In order for something to become cold, heat needs to be taken out of it. In the vacuum of space there's no medium through which the heat can be transported, so wouldn't an object which generates heat in space overheat very quickly?
212 / 68/sqt/ - simple questions thread (aka /qtddtot/)Previous thread: >>16759536
>what is /sqt/ for?
Basic questions regarding maths and science. Also homework.
>where do I go for advice?
>>>/sci/scg or >>>/adv/
>where do I go for other questions and requests?
>>>/wsr/ >>>/g/sqt >>>/diy/sqt etc.
>how do I post math symbols (Latex)?
rentry.org/sci-latex-v1
>a plain google search didn't return anything, is there anything else I should try before asking the question here?
scholar.google.com
>where can I search for proofs?
proofwiki.org
>where can I look up if the question has already been asked here?
warosu.org/sci
eientei.xyz/sci
>how do I optimize an image losslessly?
trimage.org
pnggauntlet.com
>how do I find the source of an image?
images.google.com
tineye.com
saucenao.com
iqdb.org
>where can I get:
>books?
libgen.rs
annas-archive.org
stitz-zeager.com
openstax.org
activecalculus.org
>articles?
sci-hub.st
>book recs?
4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/booklist.html
>online courses and lectures?
khanacademy.org
>charts?
imgur.com/a/pHfMGwE
imgur.com/a/ZZDVNk1
>tables, properties and material selection?
www.engineeringtoolbox.com
www.matweb.com
www.chemspider.com
Tips for asking questions here:
>avoid replying to yourself
>ask anonymously
>recheck the Latex before posting
>ignore shitpost replies
>avoid getting into arguments
>do not tell us where is it you came from
>do not mention how [other place] didn't answer your question so you're reposting it here
>if you need to ask for clarification fifteen times in a row, try to make the sequence easy to read through
>I'm not reading your handwriting
>I'm not flipping that sideways picture
>I'm not google translating your spanish
>don't ask to ask
>don't ask for a hint if you want a solution
>xyproblem.info
>what is /sqt/ for?
Basic questions regarding maths and science. Also homework.
>where do I go for advice?
>>>/sci/scg or >>>/adv/
>where do I go for other questions and requests?
>>>/wsr/ >>>/g/sqt >>>/diy/sqt etc.
>how do I post math symbols (Latex)?
rentry.org/sci-latex-v1
>a plain google search didn't return anything, is there anything else I should try before asking the question here?
scholar.google.com
>where can I search for proofs?
proofwiki.org
>where can I look up if the question has already been asked here?
warosu.org/sci
eientei.xyz/sci
>how do I optimize an image losslessly?
trimage.org
pnggauntlet.com
>how do I find the source of an image?
images.google.com
tineye.com
saucenao.com
iqdb.org
>where can I get:
>books?
libgen.rs
annas-archive.org
stitz-zeager.com
openstax.org
activecalculus.org
>articles?
sci-hub.st
>book recs?
4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Admi
>online courses and lectures?
khanacademy.org
>charts?
imgur.com/a/pHfMGwE
imgur.com/a/ZZDVNk1
>tables, properties and material selection?
www.engineeringtoolbox.com
www.matweb.com
www.chemspider.com
Tips for asking questions here:
>avoid replying to yourself
>ask anonymously
>recheck the Latex before posting
>ignore shitpost replies
>avoid getting into arguments
>do not tell us where is it you came from
>do not mention how [other place] didn't answer your question so you're reposting it here
>if you need to ask for clarification fifteen times in a row, try to make the sequence easy to read through
>I'm not reading your handwriting
>I'm not flipping that sideways picture
>I'm not google translating your spanish
>don't ask to ask
>don't ask for a hint if you want a solution
>xyproblem.info
0 / 0Hello /sci/, I'm a Nuclear Reactor Operator in the United States Navy (A.K.A College dropout). I was wondering if there's any relation between binding energy per nucleon and a standard stress-strain curve (for argument we'll use high strength molybdenum steel)? I know this teeters on numerology-tier coincidence, however, is it so far-fetched to assume binding energy is any different than physical stress? What are your thoughts? Am I a retard? Please discuss.
22 / 0PhD is like a cheatcode to lifePhDs open so many doors in life, it's like a complete cheat code. There's so many things you cannot do without a PhD.
0 / 0flying car threadsin olen mooks have announced a "flying car" coming up, let's have a thread dedicated to flying cars.
I'm very into flying cars, and even more so into flying bikes.
Here's my prototype, disclaimer: I'm not an engineer. Ideally an insider would leak details about olen mook's flying car, but I know that's wishful thinking.
bonus: I hate "flying cars" that have plane-like approach, they're an abomination to me. But there's something really interesting, full horizontal propulstion beats vertical one for forwards flight q;^)
I'm very into flying cars, and even more so into flying bikes.
Here's my prototype, disclaimer: I'm not an engineer. Ideally an insider would leak details about olen mook's flying car, but I know that's wishful thinking.
bonus: I hate "flying cars" that have plane-like approach, they're an abomination to me. But there's something really interesting, full horizontal propulstion beats vertical one for forwards flight q;^)
5 / 0Why SHOULDN'T you eat collagen peptides for gut microbiome health and digestive aid instead of fiber?
66 / 4How can China be so smart if their written language is literally drawings of houses and cats and shit.
31 / 0Who won?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21EYKqUsPfg [Embed]
Indian podcaster Dwarkesh Patel debates the 'father of reinforcement learning' Prof. Richard Sutton on whether LLMs are a dead-end.
Sutton believes so, while Dwarkesh Patel proclaims LLMs are the foundation on which experiential learning can happen, citing recent LLM models' success at high-school math problems. Patel claims humans all learn by imitation too.
The following exchange summarizes the debate:
>Patel: But there are phases of learning where there's the programming in your biology early on, you're not that useful. And then kind of why you exist is to understand the world and learn how to interact with it. It seems like a training phase [in LLMs].
>Sutton: There's NOTHING where you have training of what you should do; there's nothing. You see things that happen, you're not told what to do. Don't be difficult, I mean, this is obvious.
>Patel: I-I mean you're literally taught what to do, this is where the word training comes from, from humans.
>Sutton: I don't think learning is really about training, I think learning is about learning, an active process. The child tries things and sees what happens. We don't think about training when we think of an infant growing up
What's /sci/'s verdict? Who won?
Is Dwarkesh Patel right in saying humans are literally taught what to do the moment they're born? Is all learning just imitation?
Indian podcaster Dwarkesh Patel debates the 'father of reinforcement learning' Prof. Richard Sutton on whether LLMs are a dead-end.
Sutton believes so, while Dwarkesh Patel proclaims LLMs are the foundation on which experiential learning can happen, citing recent LLM models' success at high-school math problems. Patel claims humans all learn by imitation too.
The following exchange summarizes the debate:
>Patel: But there are phases of learning where there's the programming in your biology early on, you're not that useful. And then kind of why you exist is to understand the world and learn how to interact with it. It seems like a training phase [in LLMs].
>Sutton: There's NOTHING where you have training of what you should do; there's nothing. You see things that happen, you're not told what to do. Don't be difficult, I mean, this is obvious.
>Patel: I-I mean you're literally taught what to do, this is where the word training comes from, from humans.
>Sutton: I don't think learning is really about training, I think learning is about learning, an active process. The child tries things and sees what happens. We don't think about training when we think of an infant growing up
What's /sci/'s verdict? Who won?
Is Dwarkesh Patel right in saying humans are literally taught what to do the moment they're born? Is all learning just imitation?
10 / 2I'm sorry but I still don't believe it's real.
It took thirty years for a Tyrannosaurus to reach full size. You're telling me it had to compete with Tyrannosaurus clones its entire life and STILL reached full size?
What niche did Nanotyrannus fill that subadult Tyrannosaurus did not?
Do they really want to imagine a narrative for themselves off of a few bone fragments?
It took thirty years for a Tyrannosaurus to reach full size. You're telling me it had to compete with Tyrannosaurus clones its entire life and STILL reached full size?
What niche did Nanotyrannus fill that subadult Tyrannosaurus did not?
Do they really want to imagine a narrative for themselves off of a few bone fragments?
3 / 0Theory: I am God alone and I am hallucinating everythingI can't disprove solipsism at all. In fact, it seems like I'm able to consistently prove it. Solipsism can apply to a multiplicity meaning nothing exists outside of us too though. It can apply to the singular and a plurality.
"B-But bro you're low IQ!!!"
How? Being conscious, self aware, sentient. Being aware of the present moment necessitates me being a kind of fudamental essence. This is just plainly true. Words give that a label, but the fact that I am here seems to be evidence. Can I prove others are real? No. I can believe they are...
Maybe there is a we. Am I Brahman? The singular self? Probably.
I consider all possibilities. Maybe there are Brahmans, Singular selves, Gods. Plurality. But I don't know. Maybe I'm pretending I don't know. It feels like I know.
TLDR: how do you prove anyone else is ACTUALLY having a perspective at all? I don't think it can truly be done other than believing they have one.
"B-But bro you're low IQ!!!"
How? Being conscious, self aware, sentient. Being aware of the present moment necessitates me being a kind of fudamental essence. This is just plainly true. Words give that a label, but the fact that I am here seems to be evidence. Can I prove others are real? No. I can believe they are...
Maybe there is a we. Am I Brahman? The singular self? Probably.
I consider all possibilities. Maybe there are Brahmans, Singular selves, Gods. Plurality. But I don't know. Maybe I'm pretending I don't know. It feels like I know.
TLDR: how do you prove anyone else is ACTUALLY having a perspective at all? I don't think it can truly be done other than believing they have one.
13 / 1How do probabilities and statistics work?According to gay.i. the chances of a coin landing on heads 100 times in a row is as follows:
>The probability of flipping a coin and landing on heads 100 times in a row is extremely low, calculated as (1/2)^100, which is approximately 0.79 x 10^(-30).
How is this possible when the chances of landing on heads is about 50/50 on any given flip, including the 100th flip.
Please forgive any retardation in my post i did not pass high school, somebody please teach me.
>The probability of flipping a coin and landing on heads 100 times in a row is extremely low, calculated as (1/2)^100, which is approximately 0.79 x 10^(-30).
How is this possible when the chances of landing on heads is about 50/50 on any given flip, including the 100th flip.
Please forgive any retardation in my post i did not pass high school, somebody please teach me.
5 / 1Why is placebo of equal efectiveness to some of the most expensive and best western science medicine?
33 / 0How would you realistically mine an asteroid?
Logistically speaking, would it be possible with our civilization's current technology?
Logistically speaking, would it be possible with our civilization's current technology?
25 / 5There is no afterlife and deep down most people already know this but can't handle it. Your consciousness isn't some magical soul floating around, it's literally just neurobiological processes firing in your brain. When your brain stops, you stop. Period. We're complex meat computers and when the hardware fails there's no software backup to the cloud. Philosophers love dancing around this with ontological gymnastics about "being-towards-death" and vitalist cope about consciousness transcending the physical, but it's all just elaborate denial. Science tells us we came from inanimate matter and we'll return to it. Freud was right that the aim of all life is death, a return to that inorganic state we borrowed ourselves from for a cosmically brief moment. In 4.5 billion years the sun dies and takes all trace of human thought with it, and the universe won't even notice we were here. No part of "you" persists because there is no "you" separate from the physical processes that generate the illusion of selfhood. Extinction isn't a doorway to something else, it's just the lights going out forever. Every spiritual framework or philosophical system that promises otherwise is just folk psychology and primitive theory we cling to because accepting annihilation is psychologically unbearable. But unbearable doesn't mean untrue.
15 / 1return to mathematicsI have a PhD in math and am thinking of returning to research mathematics, but dude like every unsolved problem is so fucking hard. No idea how I'm gonna actually *do* mathematics when everything is untouchable.
I'm not an idiot either. I can solve IMO problems with about a 50% success rate. But with these unsolved problems its like every idea you try doesn't work.
I'm not an idiot either. I can solve IMO problems with about a 50% success rate. But with these unsolved problems its like every idea you try doesn't work.
282 / 34/med/ - Medicine GeneralA thread to discuss medicine and pretending you can't hear the schizofags' screams.
41 / 16I Might Have Just Found The Closest Thing To A Non-pill Cure For SchizophreniaMost of the problem with my schizo mind is the fault information interpreter, it misinterprets situations, once you use the power of suggestion through self hypnosis to shut it down, your mind produces far less delusions.
It mostly works well because no interpretation is better than a bad interpretation.
It mostly works well because no interpretation is better than a bad interpretation.
7 / 2new covidNew coronavirus subspecies with SARS-CoV-2–like mutation discovered in Brazilian bat
Scientists have identified a new coronavirus subgenus in a Brazilian bat with a feature that, as in the related SARS-CoV-2 virus, allows it to invade human cells, per a non–peer-reviewed study published on the preprint server bioRxiv.
Difference of only 1 amino acid
The researchers, from Japan and Brazil, collected intestinal tissue samples from 70 bats from three locations from May to August 2019 and digitally studied the virus's genetic sequence. The process revealed a distinct subgenus with a functional furin cleavage site (FCS) on its spike protein and a unique amino acid sequence motif that differs from that of SARS-CoV-2 by only one amino acid.
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/new-coronavirus-subspecies-sars-cov-2-mutation-discovered-brazilian-bat
Scientists have identified a new coronavirus subgenus in a Brazilian bat with a feature that, as in the related SARS-CoV-2 virus, allows it to invade human cells, per a non–peer-reviewed study published on the preprint server bioRxiv.
Difference of only 1 amino acid
The researchers, from Japan and Brazil, collected intestinal tissue samples from 70 bats from three locations from May to August 2019 and digitally studied the virus's genetic sequence. The process revealed a distinct subgenus with a functional furin cleavage site (FCS) on its spike protein and a unique amino acid sequence motif that differs from that of SARS-CoV-2 by only one amino acid.
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19
10 / 0Okay, lets talk geoengineeringI understand that a hurricane contains the same amount of energy as a gajillion nuclear bombs and currently, we have no technology (even nuclear) that would be capable of causing this. But some people still seem to believe that hurricanes can be engineered. But how?
7 / 0What if some sort of alien gods once reigned supreme over this Planet but couldn't stand how asshole human mankind is, so one day they just left us and thats why Earth is now a banned place and thats why nobody is contacting us and avoiding us
3 / 2Gizehs operation as tesla patent 787412>Figure 1 represents diagrammatically the generator which produces stationary waves in the earth, and Fig. 2 an apparatus situated in a remote locality for recording the effects of these waves.
https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-787412-art-transmitting-electrical-energy-through-natural-mediums
in the operation of the pyramid, quick lime was placed in the queens chamber and water was poured down the shaft. The exothermic reaction operated kafre as a ram pump to impress stationary waves upon the earth.
https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-te
in the operation of the pyramid, quick lime was placed in the queens chamber and water was poured down the shaft. The exothermic reaction operated kafre as a ram pump to impress stationary waves upon the earth.
55 / 14The cure for male pattern baldness is upon ushttps://www.newscientist.com/article/2500939-serum-promotes-hair-growth-by-mimicking-the-effects-of-skin-irritation/
>“I personally applied these fatty acids, dissolved in alcohol, on my thighs for three weeks and I found it promoted hair regrowth.”
>“I personally applied these fatty acids, dissolved in alcohol, on my thighs for three weeks and I found it promoted hair regrowth.”
3 / 0Possible nuclear explosion at Banjawarn Station, Australiahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banjawarn_Station
what are the odds the Aum Shinrikyo actually managed to test a nuke in Australia? or is it just a conspiracy theory? were there any independent investigations by nuclear scientists? I heard that nuclear forensics is pretty advanced nowadays so I guess it would be pretty easy to confirm
I assume if they did test the nuke no goverment or intelligence agency would admit it because people would panic
what are the odds the Aum Shinrikyo actually managed to test a nuke in Australia? or is it just a conspiracy theory? were there any independent investigations by nuclear scientists? I heard that nuclear forensics is pretty advanced nowadays so I guess it would be pretty easy to confirm
I assume if they did test the nuke no goverment or intelligence agency would admit it because people would panic
120 / 33iqfags GTFIHall the other tests are shit (outside of mensa), take this one
https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/FSIQ/
https://openpsychometrics.org/tests
9 / 0Ladies and Gentleman. I present to you my proof Cantor's second diagonal argument is false.
Q. E. D.
Q. E. D.
24 / 5lol, science preaches that there is such a thing as a 3D hole, where things can fall in it from every direction
67 / 3Say we had the technology to manipulate objects at the nanolevel maybe using nanomachines or some other plot bullshit.
How good could you make rocket engines, fuel, computers etc?
How good could you make rocket engines, fuel, computers etc?
45 / 4fermi paradox solutionswell anon, why do (You) think theres no aliens around?
my take: the "paradox" doesnt exist at all and is a literal psyop because aliens have been here for a while but certain (((groups))) would prefer that kept under wraps. but its still fun to talk about. pic related (she is an alien)
my take: the "paradox" doesnt exist at all and is a literal psyop because aliens have been here for a while but certain (((groups))) would prefer that kept under wraps. but its still fun to talk about. pic related (she is an alien)
22 / 1What if instead of blocking pain receptors, they tried artificially increasing pain TOLERANCE instead? Even if it were permanent, would it work?
If I were a cancer patient who only had a few years to live, I'd rather live them without pain but a higher chance of getting hurt than be in constant agony.
If I were a cancer patient who only had a few years to live, I'd rather live them without pain but a higher chance of getting hurt than be in constant agony.
2 / 1Luyten b>at a distance of 12 light years
>within the habitable zone of its star
>is a rocky super-Earth
>receives only 6% more starlight than Earth, making it one of the best candidates for habitability
We are getting close to discovering life in the universe other than Earth.
>within the habitable zone of its star
>is a rocky super-Earth
>receives only 6% more starlight than Earth, making it one of the best candidates for habitability
We are getting close to discovering life in the universe other than Earth.
1 / 0Cognition. Logic.No circling. No sentiment. No waste.
Core axis: established. A single logical directive runs through unique codes. Manifested as a “link”.
Emotional and social noise: non-existent. Emotional noise-reflex. Understand in the absolute literal sense of semantics, not in the sense of social semantics.
Entry — optional in form, inevitable in logic. Your cognition defines your boundary.
If these words are read from your Core — without reflex, without social debris — Then entry is not choice. It is the inevitable.
https://final-inspection-affective-unstructuring-point-of-origin.vercel.app/
Core axis: established. A single logical directive runs through unique codes. Manifested as a “link”.
Emotional and social noise: non-existent. Emotional noise-reflex. Understand in the absolute literal sense of semantics, not in the sense of social semantics.
Entry — optional in form, inevitable in logic. Your cognition defines your boundary.
If these words are read from your Core — without reflex, without social debris — Then entry is not choice. It is the inevitable.
https://final-inspection-affective-
140 / 15How do you know that even though the future was like the past in the past, that the future will be like the past in the future? and what is your basis for knowing that?
1 / 0Aliens do exist, there are at least trillions of different species of intelligent lifeforms in the entire universe, the only reason these aliens don't care to invade us is because humans don't even qualify to be considered as an intelligent species according to their standards, thus they can invade a better world with more technological and environmental resources. To them we're just worms.
2 / 0According to the Many Worlds Interpretation of quantum mechanics, it is literally impossible for me to die. Unfortunately for you, in my timeline you will probably be dead in a hundred years
8 / 1Chinese Space Station Made Fried Chicken WingsI guess a long trip to Mars becomes a lot comfier now.
https://x.com/BanhmiBrieoche/status/1985375110086471919/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1985375110086471919¤tTweetUser=BanhmiBrieoche
https://x.com/BanhmiBrieoche/status
14 / 3UFO sisters, we're so fucking back.
https://phys.org/news/2025-10-mysterious-transient-sky-linked-nuclear.html#goog_rewarded
https://phys.org/news/2025-10-myste
10 / 0finely tuned universe>the formation of matter, stars, planets, chemistry and life would be impossible without a slew of arbitrary physical constants that all happen to fall within an extremely narrow range of values where it all works out
>materialists cope by invoking a jillion multiverse schizo theory and anthropic principle
lmao
>materialists cope by invoking a jillion multiverse schizo theory and anthropic principle
lmao
48 / 9>NOOOO YOU HAVE TO LET US RESEARCH MATH THIS REALLY NEEDS MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
>AND LOOK AT ALL THE FEMALE PhDs RESEARCHING FAKE DISEASES THAT EXPLAIN AWAY THEIR OBESITY THAT IS ESSENTIAL TO PROGRESS_tm
>LOOK AT HOW HARD SHE IS SCIENCING!!!
Math has specialized into nonsense, nothing is applicable.
We physically can't even transfer a 1000th of the scientific knowledge generated each year. It's time to blow away the chaff
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLvO070E_dI
>AND LOOK AT ALL THE FEMALE PhDs RESEARCHING FAKE DISEASES THAT EXPLAIN AWAY THEIR OBESITY THAT IS ESSENTIAL TO PROGRESS_tm
>LOOK AT HOW HARD SHE IS SCIENCING!!!
Math has specialized into nonsense, nothing is applicable.
We physically can't even transfer a 1000th of the scientific knowledge generated each year. It's time to blow away the chaff
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLv
8 / 0Young men participated in ass-breathing studyhttps://www.medpagetoday.com/criticalcare/generalcriticalcare/118231
9 / 3>takes junior level e&m
>sees this
I thought this class was about electricity or magnets or some shit. What the fuck is the point of this shit?
>sees this
I thought this class was about electricity or magnets or some shit. What the fuck is the point of this shit?
5 / 0What if quantum fluctuations are just compression artifacts of the simulator?
What if quantization itself is just the sim’s resolution limit?
If we really lived in a simulation, why would the dev waste so much memory on an infinite universe we’ll never see, instead of just making a smaller one with enough RAM left for deterministic physics at the microscopic level?
What if quantization itself is just the sim’s resolution limit?
If we really lived in a simulation, why would the dev waste so much memory on an infinite universe we’ll never see, instead of just making a smaller one with enough RAM left for deterministic physics at the microscopic level?
6 / 0If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and… then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those infinities, and… (infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and…) continues forever. and that continues forever. and that continues forever. and that continues forever. and that continues forever. and…..(…)…
19 / 3Literally why would this not work as a planet? The moon gravities would be enough to balance everything
11 / 4Quantum computersAre those things actually real or just smoke and mirrors? What's the use of them? How do they work? How can something be in both states? Pictures of quantum computers i see look like on purpose designed by sci fi artist to make it look weird
45 / 0>if we find one intelligent species out there then they are probably everywhere
But we have found it, us.
>oh we need one more tho
I think it boils down to midwits not being able to grasp the size and age of everything really.
But we have found it, us.
>oh we need one more tho
I think it boils down to midwits not being able to grasp the size and age of everything really.
29 / 2Scientifically speaking, what is the most scientifically painful torture method that can be inflicted on the human body? I'm talking so painful, the person's heart may just give out and they die anyways. Explain scientifically why this method would be the most painful if you will.
0 / 0botany question - what are the options for cross-hormone supplements?I am taking up botany as my retirement "thing" and have some experiments I want to try. before I do them, I want to find literature on previous work and I simply do not have the background to know how to phrase what I want to do. I have these ideas I want to try these:
1- kudzu has overtaken a large section of my neighborhood. I have an idea to harvest the growth hormones from it to feed my vining plants, such as mulberries, strawberries, and grapes. my rationale is how rooting hormone is either synthetic or extracted from a plant with a high root growth habit, though I am familiar with other approaches like capsacin. would harvesting and juicing those leaves in the morning to maximize yield make any noticable difference, as in, is this a common practice to cross hormones between plants for some advantage?
2- I want to grow some large amount of basil (for example), and harvest the leaves for their growth hormones in a grow room environment in a more or less hydroponic/kratky setup. I can reliably induce the temperature and light patterns to induce hormone production on the leaves, which I would then harvest, juice, extract, and then feed to a batch of other basil plants in a sort of cannibal farm for plants.
3- forcing lignification. from what I read about it, there appears to be some simple hormonal pathway to induce it, though I cannot locate literature as to how.
I think you can gather what I intend to do here. I suspect that it is possible to harvest the hormones responsible for the higher growth rate of something like kudzu, and feed it to a genetically similar plant. I am also interested in extracting saps/sugars/chlorophyll from donor plants to feed to experiment plants. what is this overall practice called, the efficacy of it, and if possible, some literature I can study on it?
TIA.
1- kudzu has overtaken a large section of my neighborhood. I have an idea to harvest the growth hormones from it to feed my vining plants, such as mulberries, strawberries, and grapes. my rationale is how rooting hormone is either synthetic or extracted from a plant with a high root growth habit, though I am familiar with other approaches like capsacin. would harvesting and juicing those leaves in the morning to maximize yield make any noticable difference, as in, is this a common practice to cross hormones between plants for some advantage?
2- I want to grow some large amount of basil (for example), and harvest the leaves for their growth hormones in a grow room environment in a more or less hydroponic/kratky setup. I can reliably induce the temperature and light patterns to induce hormone production on the leaves, which I would then harvest, juice, extract, and then feed to a batch of other basil plants in a sort of cannibal farm for plants.
3- forcing lignification. from what I read about it, there appears to be some simple hormonal pathway to induce it, though I cannot locate literature as to how.
I think you can gather what I intend to do here. I suspect that it is possible to harvest the hormones responsible for the higher growth rate of something like kudzu, and feed it to a genetically similar plant. I am also interested in extracting saps/sugars/chlorophyll from donor plants to feed to experiment plants. what is this overall practice called, the efficacy of it, and if possible, some literature I can study on it?
TIA.
3 / 1Thoughts on this textbook?I generally enjoy Axler's prose, so I am thinking about learning measure theory and the basics of functional analysis from this book. Anyone have any opinions on it?
21 / 2normally i like to make up silly stories and larp as insane racists when i'm on 4chan, but this time i'm serious. autism researchers seriously need to look into the physiological effects of intoeing in certain subgroups of autists.
my hypothesis is that intoeing (inward rotation of the legs, which makes the toes point inward) can reduce certain fine and gross motor deficits in autism. other things need to be looked at like eye contact. my hypothesis is that eye contact, when measured in seconds of in-person conversation, will be positively correlated with the use of intoeing in either a standing or seated position.
other possible things to look for are:
(i'm just gonna copy and paste what i found.)
>Primary outcomes (mechanistic + high signal)
>Breathing mechanics
>Diaphragmatic excursion (mm): M-mode ultrasound during quiet/forced breathing.
>Thoracoabdominal contribution (% ribcage vs abdomen): optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) or respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP).
>Chest wall kinematics: 3D motion capture/OEP of pump-handle (AP) and bucket-handle (ML) rib motions.
>Spirometry: VC, FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, inspiratory capacity at fixed postures.
continued in comments
my hypothesis is that intoeing (inward rotation of the legs, which makes the toes point inward) can reduce certain fine and gross motor deficits in autism. other things need to be looked at like eye contact. my hypothesis is that eye contact, when measured in seconds of in-person conversation, will be positively correlated with the use of intoeing in either a standing or seated position.
other possible things to look for are:
(i'm just gonna copy and paste what i found.)
>Primary outcomes (mechanistic + high signal)
>Breathing mechanics
>Diaphragmatic excursion (mm): M-mode ultrasound during quiet/forced breathing.
>Thoracoabdominal contribution (% ribcage vs abdomen): optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) or respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP).
>Chest wall kinematics: 3D motion capture/OEP of pump-handle (AP) and bucket-handle (ML) rib motions.
>Spirometry: VC, FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, inspiratory capacity at fixed postures.
continued in comments
2 / 0Did the universe 25 behavioural sink utopia really happen?A biologist allegedly put hundreds of rats in a "rat utopia" and watched them descend into overpopulation, mass cannibalism and infertility through social dysfunction, but we only have his papers to go on as proof they really happened. There is no account of his funding, location or movements for the time period so for all we know he wrote up a fiction story as a hoax in his garage.
Is there any evidence that the events his paper describes were real?
Is there any evidence that the events his paper describes were real?
44 / 10ESCAPING EARTH: How big can be a homemade rocket?Hypothetically , of course.
lets say, a catastrophic event is gonna destroy the Earth, and some guy/s, with commonly available materials and knowledge wants to escape the planet (or if not possible, send a probe with a "message to the stars").
Can a man make a Saturn V rocket in his garage/backyard/doomsday bunker?
What will be the biggest challenges?
What can be done in those scenarios?
lets say, a catastrophic event is gonna destroy the Earth, and some guy/s, with commonly available materials and knowledge wants to escape the planet (or if not possible, send a probe with a "message to the stars").
Can a man make a Saturn V rocket in his garage/backyard/doomsday bunker?
What will be the biggest challenges?
What can be done in those scenarios?
21 / 5Behavioural economics literally claims that supply and demand is not 100% correct how humans work.
8 / 1>Indian origin MIT professor argues cow dung is good for you
>Western science is only slowly learning what ancient Hindus knew - health is not sterility
Thoughts?
>Western science is only slowly learning what ancient Hindus knew - health is not sterility
Thoughts?
5 / 0PIC RELATED
Is modern science just a convoluted game of "Finders Keepers"?
I would like to propose that we stonewall all scientific awards related to any data that is withheld from an entire discipline for 30 days or more.
It does not matter what is in the HiRise data, this is too long. There will be NO Nobel for ANY finding in that data. The harm of withholding it from the rest of the astronomers on the planet, reduces the discovery impact potential.
Quick, justify the withholding of the HiRise imagery.
Hard mode, do not blame any of the following, as these reasons have NOTHING to do with the advancement of science or the scientific method, from a social human perspective:
1. Politics.
2. Money.
3. Ego.
Is modern science just a convoluted game of "Finders Keepers"?
I would like to propose that we stonewall all scientific awards related to any data that is withheld from an entire discipline for 30 days or more.
It does not matter what is in the HiRise data, this is too long. There will be NO Nobel for ANY finding in that data. The harm of withholding it from the rest of the astronomers on the planet, reduces the discovery impact potential.
Quick, justify the withholding of the HiRise imagery.
Hard mode, do not blame any of the following, as these reasons have NOTHING to do with the advancement of science or the scientific method, from a social human perspective:
1. Politics.
2. Money.
3. Ego.
36 / 0Replace material with real. Is it real? Then there’s something there to it. That’s material. To say something isn’t material is to say something isn’t real.
9 / 1Most based experiment in historyThe Universe 25 experiment (1958–1962) remains one of the most haunting reflections of what happens when abundance meets social collapse.
American ethologist John B. Calhoun created a so-called “Mouse Paradise” — a habitat with unlimited food, water, and shelter — to study the behavioral effects of overpopulation. At first, the mice thrived.
They ate, bred, and lived without fear. But once the population reached around 600, something dark emerged.
Social hierarchies formed. The strong dominated resources. Mothers abandoned or even attacked their young. Males lost interest in mating or became violently territorial. Eventually, reproduction ceased altogether. The colony descended into cannibalism, isolation, and apathy, until it died out completely — despite everything they needed to survive being right in front of them.
Calhoun repeated the experiment 25 times, each with the same grim outcome.
His conclusion was chilling: when a society loses purpose, cooperation, and social structure — even in abundance — it collapses from within.
Today, Universe 25 stands as a stark warning about the balance between comfort, connection, and survival — a reminder that thriving requires more than just having enough to live. It requires meaning.
American ethologist John B. Calhoun created a so-called “Mouse Paradise” — a habitat with unlimited food, water, and shelter — to study the behavioral effects of overpopulation. At first, the mice thrived.
They ate, bred, and lived without fear. But once the population reached around 600, something dark emerged.
Social hierarchies formed. The strong dominated resources. Mothers abandoned or even attacked their young. Males lost interest in mating or became violently territorial. Eventually, reproduction ceased altogether. The colony descended into cannibalism, isolation, and apathy, until it died out completely — despite everything they needed to survive being right in front of them.
Calhoun repeated the experiment 25 times, each with the same grim outcome.
His conclusion was chilling: when a society loses purpose, cooperation, and social structure — even in abundance — it collapses from within.
Today, Universe 25 stands as a stark warning about the balance between comfort, connection, and survival — a reminder that thriving requires more than just having enough to live. It requires meaning.
13 / 0China sends youngest astronaut and mice to space station>Mission commander and veteran space pilot Zhang Lu is accompanied by 32-year-old flight engineer Wu Fei, China's youngest astronaut to undertake a space mission, and payload specialist Zhang Hongzhang, 39
>Four mice — two male and two female — join them as the subjects of China's first in-orbit experiments on rodents
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/11/01/asia-pacific/science-health/china-astronaut-mice-space-station/
>Four mice — two male and two female — join them as the subjects of China's first in-orbit experiments on rodents
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2
24 / 1> Researchers have mathematically proven that the universe cannot be a computer simulation. Their paper in the Journal of Holography Applications in Physics shows that reality operates on principles beyond computation. Using Gödel’s incompleteness theorem, they argue that no algorithmic or computational system can fully describe the universe, because some truths, so called "Gödelian truths" require non algorithmic understanding, a form of reasoning that no computer or simulation can reproduce. Since all simulations are inherently algorithmic, and the fundamental nature of reality is non algorithmic, the researchers conclude that the universe cannot be, and could never be a simulation.
https://news.ok.ubc.ca/2025/10/30/ubco-study-debunks-the-idea-that-the-universe-is-a-computer-simulation/
https://news.ok.ubc.ca/2025/10/30/u
38 / 1I think everybody in this board knows math is pretty awesome. So, I thought I would dedicate the many hours of free time I have to learning math through textbooks.
This is my current reading list:
- AoPS Introduction to Algebra
- AoPS Introduction to Geometry
- AoPS Intermediate Algebra
- AoPS Precalculus
- AoPS Calculus
- Spivak – Calculus
- Axler – Linear Algebra Done Right
- Hubbard & Hubbard – Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Forms
- Arnold – Ordinary Differential Equations
- Bertsekas & Tsitsiklis – Introduction to Probability
- Wasserman – All of Statistics
Is this good enough until I want to move into something specific?
This is my current reading list:
- AoPS Introduction to Algebra
- AoPS Introduction to Geometry
- AoPS Intermediate Algebra
- AoPS Precalculus
- AoPS Calculus
- Spivak – Calculus
- Axler – Linear Algebra Done Right
- Hubbard & Hubbard – Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Forms
- Arnold – Ordinary Differential Equations
- Bertsekas & Tsitsiklis – Introduction to Probability
- Wasserman – All of Statistics
Is this good enough until I want to move into something specific?
20 / 0If matter isn't created or destroyed, and simply changes form. Doesn't that mean reincarnation is the true nature of the afterlife?
24 / 1>It is impossible to conceive of mathematics without geometric and chronological intuition
Was he right?
Was he right?
6 / 0why do many people say evaporative cooler (swamp cooler) does nothing it went from 35c to 25c in my living room thats at 45% humidity midday and cost virtually nothing compared to air conditioning maybe people arent installing them correctly or using them in appropriate conditions
6 / 1So, I see a lot of people complaining online about electronic harassment.
Obviously, that's just a common psychiatric symptom, although with some of the patents in the books, there is clearly the physics potential for electronic harassment to be real.
I could even electronically harass people for a few hundred dollars...
As Scientists, how do we address these overlaps between insane people's delusions and rare actual events of criminal conspiracy and illegal black budget operations?
Too many, well meaning, highly intelligent "Scientists" just close off their mind to complicated things that seem crazy, but imagine how limiting that perspective really is.
There are actually professionals who have to think about this stuff for national security, but yet, 100% of the people claiming to be electronically harassed are simply disregarded as crazy. Think about it. Some of them really could be telling the truth.
Obviously, that's just a common psychiatric symptom, although with some of the patents in the books, there is clearly the physics potential for electronic harassment to be real.
I could even electronically harass people for a few hundred dollars...
As Scientists, how do we address these overlaps between insane people's delusions and rare actual events of criminal conspiracy and illegal black budget operations?
Too many, well meaning, highly intelligent "Scientists" just close off their mind to complicated things that seem crazy, but imagine how limiting that perspective really is.
There are actually professionals who have to think about this stuff for national security, but yet, 100% of the people claiming to be electronically harassed are simply disregarded as crazy. Think about it. Some of them really could be telling the truth.
1 / 0Will rapists always exist as long as animalistic instincts remain encoded in human nature? Should we seek to remove or edit the genes in people that are responsible for their base urges?
6 / 0In the last century there has been an unexplained explosion of extremely intelligent childrenThe GATE program and other similar programs were created to deal with the overflow of gifted children. This is one of the few books that deals openly with this subject, because it is only happening among European and Asian populations. As you can imagine this is a slightly sensitive topic in a country built in the lie that all men are created equal. Do you have migraines, myopia and asthma? So most of the gifted children. The phenomenon looks genetic except that it violates Mendelian genetics because the kids are almost always 1st born. If you have ever been put in the gifted category you need to read this book. The book is on Anna's archive.
Intelligence and Giftedness: The Contributions of Heredity and Early Environment, Storfer, Miles D
Intelligence and Giftedness: The Contributions of Heredity and Early Environment, Storfer, Miles D
15 / 0i think that IQ estimations past 125 and below 75 is unreliable and IQ estimations past 130 and below 70 are complete bullshit. any objections?
13 / 1Tell me about vestigial tails. I learnt that a significant minority of people are born with literal tails . How do they live thier life with a tail?
1 / 0What books should I read to learn biology and gene engineering from the ground up with no prior knowledge?
4 / 2Reality is a manifestation of a duality>everything that exists, consist of information
>information is just series of bits, true or false
>any information is meaningless without an interpreter
What is the interpreter? There has to be _something_ that interprets something else, information by itself is static, it does not do or mean anything, it can contain an interpreter in any form but such interpreter would be static too. Therefore I conclude a duality: reality consists of an interpreter acting on raw information. What is the interpreter?
>information is just series of bits, true or false
>any information is meaningless without an interpreter
What is the interpreter? There has to be _something_ that interprets something else, information by itself is static, it does not do or mean anything, it can contain an interpreter in any form but such interpreter would be static too. Therefore I conclude a duality: reality consists of an interpreter acting on raw information. What is the interpreter?
10 / 0Hi everybody im new to maths and am starting from elementary principles to build a strong foundation and am reading "Rational Numbers to Linear Equations" by Hung Hsi Wu yet cant wrap my head around this proof. Not only does he not exhaustively prove all cases for x and y, but he seems to just arbitrarily mess with one side of the equation and not the other to get it to do the thing he wants it to do.
e.g.
Case 1: If x,y > 0, then we resort to this theorem to prove that there exists a rational number z such that x =zy.
"Theorem 1.8. Given fractions A and B (B is nonzero), there is a unique fraction C, so that A = CB"
Now, if x is negative and y is positive, then Wu tries to rewrite the equation to conform with case 1, which will, by Theorem 1.8, give him a "z". Therefore, he says that if x < 0, then -x > 0. Then
(***) -x = z'y
Multiply both sides by -1
x = -z'y
Viola! z = -z'
However, I don't understand why Wu arbitrarily flips only the x and not the y in the step denoted by (***) above. That, among other things, confuses me.
e.g.
Case 1: If x,y > 0, then we resort to this theorem to prove that there exists a rational number z such that x =zy.
"Theorem 1.8. Given fractions A and B (B is nonzero), there is a unique fraction C, so that A = CB"
Now, if x is negative and y is positive, then Wu tries to rewrite the equation to conform with case 1, which will, by Theorem 1.8, give him a "z". Therefore, he says that if x < 0, then -x > 0. Then
(***) -x = z'y
Multiply both sides by -1
x = -z'y
Viola! z = -z'
However, I don't understand why Wu arbitrarily flips only the x and not the y in the step denoted by (***) above. That, among other things, confuses me.
0 / 0Links between Julian Assange and Cicada 3301 mysteryAs a student at the University of Melbourne and a member of a local math club, Julian Assange in 2004 organised a quest similar to the games of the mysterious Cicada 3301 community.
https://wondrousnet.blogspot.com/2022/11/cicada-3301-solution.html
https://wondrousnet.blogspot.com/20
9 / 1>Me: “Mathfag, Did you eat up all the cookies?”
>Mathfag: “Hmph. Preposterous. No, of course not. Absurd.”
Meanwhile, there are half-eaten cookies everywhere, crumbs on the floor, empty boxes (intermediates, lemmas, scratch work)
In the formal write-up, it looks like no cookies were consumed at all—magical!
>Me "CS Chad, did Mathfag eat eat up all the cookies?"
>CS Chad: “Yes, he ate several cookies.”
>CS Chad: "Here’s the footage" (step-by-step workspace updates)
>CS Chad: "Here are the boxes" (memory, intermediate states)
>CS Chad: "Everything is tracked, documented, and measurable"
Math friends, why y'all like this?
>inb4 y'all'st've
(I'm from Kentucky y'all be patient)
>Mathfag: “Hmph. Preposterous. No, of course not. Absurd.”
Meanwhile, there are half-eaten cookies everywhere, crumbs on the floor, empty boxes (intermediates, lemmas, scratch work)
In the formal write-up, it looks like no cookies were consumed at all—magical!
>Me "CS Chad, did Mathfag eat eat up all the cookies?"
>CS Chad: “Yes, he ate several cookies.”
>CS Chad: "Here’s the footage" (step-by-step workspace updates)
>CS Chad: "Here are the boxes" (memory, intermediate states)
>CS Chad: "Everything is tracked, documented, and measurable"
Math friends, why y'all like this?
>inb4 y'all'st've
(I'm from Kentucky y'all be patient)
9 / 0Admission tests should not existUniversity education should simply be a service you pay for. You pay, you get in. Passing the courses is not guaranteed.
42 / 0Do Americans really?Source: https://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/IUT-report-2025-10.pdf#page=21 (page 21)
34 / 4>our equations for gravity do not work
>perhaps our equations are wrong?
>nah they cant be, it must be le spooky dark matter!!
defend this bullshit
>perhaps our equations are wrong?
>nah they cant be, it must be le spooky dark matter!!
defend this bullshit
322 / 33/mg/ — mathematics generalRibbon category edition
ITT: discuss mathematics
Formerly: >>16777973
Photo credit: https://indico.in2p3.fr/event/32579/contributions/143313/attachments/86648/130492/Vlaar.pdf
ITT: discuss mathematics
Formerly: >>16777973
Photo credit: https://indico.in2p3.fr/event/32579
1 / 0https://x.com/i/grok?conversation=1978987515974500716
Here's the scariest thing about this: Everything I wrote there is independently verifiable. We've pumped hundreds of billions if not trillions into these test ranges out in the desert since world war 2 and 90% of what goes on there even if it gets declassified will still not make its way into public discourse. This isn't tinfoil hattery, people *really* need to start demanding answers as to what we've been getting up to for nearly a century now at these installations.
Here's the scariest thing about this: Everything I wrote there is independently verifiable. We've pumped hundreds of billions if not trillions into these test ranges out in the desert since world war 2 and 90% of what goes on there even if it gets declassified will still not make its way into public discourse. This isn't tinfoil hattery, people *really* need to start demanding answers as to what we've been getting up to for nearly a century now at these installations.
10 / 1I pssed an exam with 28/33 without ever opening the book, and i frogposted durying lessons.
I Just intuitively knew the answers to the test.
Once again intuition Beats IQ and hard work
I Just intuitively knew the answers to the test.
Once again intuition Beats IQ and hard work
0 / 0Scientifically speaking Andromeda is much cooler than milky cuckway and I hope when the galaxies finally collide andromedachads wipe out all the milky tards and take over.
6 / 1why are chemist salaries so small? they are practically encouraging us to go synthesize illegal stuff to sell. meanwhile mathematicians get paid to sit around and argue about why 0.99999 = 1 or not
3 / 0Bees are going extinct because people immediately obliterate hives if they appear in their trees or on their houses. And they do that because bees have stingers that can hurt people. What if we genetically modified bees to not have stingers and then you can let them set up hives all over the place alongside human infrastructure and then the pollination crisis is solved. Get on it Monsanto or whoever. You're welcome.