0 / 0Welcome to /his/ - History & HumanitiesThis board is dedicated to the discussion of history and the other humanities such as philosophy, religion, law, classical artwork, archeology, anthropology, ancient languages, etc. Please use /lit/ for discussions of literature. Threads should be about specific topics, and the creation of "general" threads is discouraged.
For the purpose of determining what is history, please do not start threads about events taking place less than 25 years ago. Historical discussions should be focused on past events, and not their contemporary consequences. Discussion of modern politics, current events, popular culture, or other non-historical topics should be posted elsewhere. General discussions about international culture should go on /int/.
/his/ is not /pol/, and Global Rule #3 is in effect. Do not try to treat this board as /pol/ with dates. Blatant racism and trolling will not be tolerated, and a high level of discourse is expected. History can be examined from many different conflicting viewpoints; please treat other posters with respect and address the content of their post instead of attacking their character.
When discussing history, please reference credible source material, and provide as much supporting information as possible in your posts.
For the purpose of determining what is history, please do not start threads about events taking place less than 25 years ago. Historical discussions should be focused on past events, and not their contemporary consequences. Discussion of modern politics, current events, popular culture, or other non-historical topics should be posted elsewhere. General discussions about international culture should go on /int/.
/his/ is not /pol/, and Global Rule #3 is in effect. Do not try to treat this board as /pol/ with dates. Blatant racism and trolling will not be tolerated, and a high level of discourse is expected. History can be examined from many different conflicting viewpoints; please treat other posters with respect and address the content of their post instead of attacking their character.
When discussing history, please reference credible source material, and provide as much supporting information as possible in your posts.
62 / 12The only reason why nordicist sissies want to claim North Italy is because as a region, they are better than most of Northern Europe by every metric, GDP per capita, HDI, IQ, etc. and to top it off they have the history that Northern Europe lacks.
In reality Northern Italians are less NW European than Iberians even.
In reality Northern Italians are less NW European than Iberians even.
3 / 0Wait a minute, Protestants dont eat Jesus' body and blood that was transmutated from unleavened bread and wine during eucharist?
All protestants do is eat crackers and drink grape juice?
Have fun and Enjoy hell.
All protestants do is eat crackers and drink grape juice?
Have fun and Enjoy hell.
63 / 4Israeli Left>Israel is initially founded by a bunch of continental socialist Euro Jews who dream of communal living and labour politics and shit
>Israel today is a literal right wing ethnostate governed by religious radicals, nationalists, and techcapitalists
Unironically what the hell happened there?
>Israel today is a literal right wing ethnostate governed by religious radicals, nationalists, and techcapitalists
Unironically what the hell happened there?
72 / 21Japan’s Jōmon = WHG?It's well established that the modern Japs have around 12-18% of Jōmon admixture. But who really were they, genetically wise?
Whenever this tpic comes up, the first pictures posted are the ones showing those primitive-looking dravidian/austronesian people. But it makes no sense for them to comprise a fifth of the Japanese genepool. Let’s egzamine why:
A few facts about the modern Japanese:
>they have much more facial hair than other asians
>many of them have brown eyes with much weaker epicanthic folds
> Jōmon skulls look very similar as the WHG/Yamnaya skulls
>they have comparable (maybe even higher) average IQ than the Koreans
This alone hints a European-like affinity.
The first three facts point to an European-type admixture, and the fourth basically disqualifies any austronesian/dravidian possibility (if those primitive people contributed more than 15% of the Japanese genepool, their average IQ would be in the 90s, while in reality it reaches 105).
Source:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264163184_Facial_characteristics_of_the_prehistoric_and_early-modern_inhabitants_of_the_Okinawa_Islands_in_comparison_to_the_contemporary_people_of_Honshu
1/4
Whenever this tpic comes up, the first pictures posted are the ones showing those primitive-looking dravidian/austronesian people. But it makes no sense for them to comprise a fifth of the Japanese genepool. Let’s egzamine why:
A few facts about the modern Japanese:
>they have much more facial hair than other asians
>many of them have brown eyes with much weaker epicanthic folds
> Jōmon skulls look very similar as the WHG/Yamnaya skulls
>they have comparable (maybe even higher) average IQ than the Koreans
This alone hints a European-like affinity.
The first three facts point to an European-type admixture, and the fourth basically disqualifies any austronesian/dravidian possibility (if those primitive people contributed more than 15% of the Japanese genepool, their average IQ would be in the 90s, while in reality it reaches 105).
Source:
https://www.researchgate.net/public
1/4
15 / 1Why is rape illegal, immoral, and unethical when women can just wash their asses, take antibiotics, and undergo abortions?
People should treat rape unseriously like getting wet in the rain.
> "Omg, ive been raped. Well, whatever. Its no big deal. I could just wash my ass. Problems solved."
People should treat rape unseriously like getting wet in the rain.
> "Omg, ive been raped. Well, whatever. Its no big deal. I could just wash my ass. Problems solved."
3 / 1Sean Sellers, who was executed by the state of Oklahoma in 1999, was that state's 15th execution since 1976 and the only person in the post-Furman era to be put to death for a murder committed when he was under the age of 17. His case drew worldwide attention. The details around Seller's early life are unclear--he was born in Corcoran, California on May 18, 1969 but was living with his mother in Oklahoma City when the murder occurred. In 1985, then 16 year old Sellers and his friend Richard Howard talked about what it would be like to kill another human being. On the night of September 8, the two teens walked into a Circle K convenience store and shot dead the store clerk, 32 year old Robert Bower, when he refused to sell them beer for being underage. Howard did not actually participate in the shooting. Sellers told him he wanted to know what it was like to kill someone.
He next decided to poison his mother Vonda, age 32, over an argument about a girl he was dating. Sellers tried to put rat poison in her drinks but failed to kill her. On March 5, 1986 he shot her and his stepfather Lee Bellofatto, age 43, with a .44 revolver as they slept. Clad in only boxer shorts to avoid getting blood on his clothes, Sellers first shot Bellofatto in the head. The noise woke up Vonda, who was immediately shot in the face. Sellers tried to rearrange the crime scene so it looked like a burglar had broken in and killed them. He went to Howard's house and told him he'd killed his parents.
He next decided to poison his mother Vonda, age 32, over an argument about a girl he was dating. Sellers tried to put rat poison in her drinks but failed to kill her. On March 5, 1986 he shot her and his stepfather Lee Bellofatto, age 43, with a .44 revolver as they slept. Clad in only boxer shorts to avoid getting blood on his clothes, Sellers first shot Bellofatto in the head. The noise woke up Vonda, who was immediately shot in the face. Sellers tried to rearrange the crime scene so it looked like a burglar had broken in and killed them. He went to Howard's house and told him he'd killed his parents.
3 / 1Julius Caesar was Jesus Christ!After a year of research (applied autism) I finally cracked the code!
Rome in Italy was built in the Middle Ages, at the same time as the rest of Europe. The Egyptian Ptolemaic empire didn't die at the founding of Rome, Ptolemaic Kings just took on regional aliases.
Juilus Caesar's real identity was Ptolemy XI Alexander II, Cleopatra's uncle-husband. He also used the regional aliases of Asander, King of Bosphorus. Cleopatra took on the Bosphoran identity of Dynamis, queen of Bosphorus.
The "As" in Asander comes from the Egyptian name "Asar" which was another name for Osiris, from which the Etruscan word "Aesar" (also spelled Aesus which was pronounced eh-soos/Eh-Zeus/Iesus), meaning god or divine, likely derives. The Greek language adds a "K" to foreign words, so Aesar -> Greek Kaesar -> Latin Caesar. There likely is a connection between this name and "Asar-Hapi" (Osiris-Apis), another name for the Graeco-Egyptian god Serapis (Osiris + Apis = Osorapis). He was the first "Jesus" and then his descendants took that title as an avatar.
Mark Antony's real identity was either Ptolemy of Cyprus, a brother of Ptolemy XII Auletes (Cleopatra’s father) aka Mithridates Chrestus aka king Herod or else he was Cleopatra's father Ptolemy XII Auletes/Ptolemy X Alexander I, king of Egypt (she was also married to two of her brothers. This is how incestuous this family was).
King Izates of Adiabene was Asander and Dynamis's grandson. Tiberius Julius Sauromates II was their great-grandson, etc. "Jesus" was an avatar in an imperial cult.
Rome in Italy was built in the Middle Ages, at the same time as the rest of Europe. The Egyptian Ptolemaic empire didn't die at the founding of Rome, Ptolemaic Kings just took on regional aliases.
Juilus Caesar's real identity was Ptolemy XI Alexander II, Cleopatra's uncle-husband. He also used the regional aliases of Asander, King of Bosphorus. Cleopatra took on the Bosphoran identity of Dynamis, queen of Bosphorus.
The "As" in Asander comes from the Egyptian name "Asar" which was another name for Osiris, from which the Etruscan word "Aesar" (also spelled Aesus which was pronounced eh-soos/Eh-Zeus/Iesus), meaning god or divine, likely derives. The Greek language adds a "K" to foreign words, so Aesar -> Greek Kaesar -> Latin Caesar. There likely is a connection between this name and "Asar-Hapi" (Osiris-Apis), another name for the Graeco-Egyptian god Serapis (Osiris + Apis = Osorapis). He was the first "Jesus" and then his descendants took that title as an avatar.
Mark Antony's real identity was either Ptolemy of Cyprus, a brother of Ptolemy XII Auletes (Cleopatra’s father) aka Mithridates Chrestus aka king Herod or else he was Cleopatra's father Ptolemy XII Auletes/Ptolemy X Alexander I, king of Egypt (she was also married to two of her brothers. This is how incestuous this family was).
King Izates of Adiabene was Asander and Dynamis's grandson. Tiberius Julius Sauromates II was their great-grandson, etc. "Jesus" was an avatar in an imperial cult.
1 / 0Has there ever been , in real history and not mere mythology, a "Vedic Theocratic" Indian kingdom, where casteist laws, Manu's Law were the official rule of law? Where all education was religious\theocratic (Vedic), punishments like scalding a brahmin to death in burning wine for drinking wine, or pouring hot lead on a shudra for listening to Vedas, were actually enacted?
did such a thing ever exist?
did such a thing ever exist?
166 / 16It's impossible that the Holocaust didn't happen.Europe jewish population in 1933-1935 wasn't even 10 million at that time, it was about 9.5 million at maximum.
If the Holocaust did not happen and, let us say that almost every jew in Europe moved to Israel (2025's population: about 10 million), where did all those jews go? Europe had the greatest jewish population in the world, and now it is gone! How could that happen if not by a great extermination? I'm no zionist nor good goyim, but the Holocaust DEFINITIVELY happened.
If the Holocaust did not happen and, let us say that almost every jew in Europe moved to Israel (2025's population: about 10 million), where did all those jews go? Europe had the greatest jewish population in the world, and now it is gone! How could that happen if not by a great extermination? I'm no zionist nor good goyim, but the Holocaust DEFINITIVELY happened.
51 / 7when did latin americans start identifying as europeans instead of with their amerindian roots?
56 / 7Why was the "evil stepmom" archetype a thing in the past?And how did it eventually transform into the thicc busty milf we want to sex with?
1 / 0The genetic diversity of NorwegiansAs represented by the three component groups that make up their ancestry.
I wish someone knew the geographic origins of the sampled individuals so we could make a genetic gradient map
I wish someone knew the geographic origins of the sampled individuals so we could make a genetic gradient map
22 / 0In the Quran there is no limit to "wives" one could supposedly have, as sunnis like to claim through false tradition, but the Quran is clear
It said "in twos AND threes AND fours" it's successive accumulative.
Also this verse has nothing to do with doing just with females. it literally said "If you fear injust with Orphans/vulnerable" not females here.
It said "in twos AND threes AND fours" it's successive accumulative.
Also this verse has nothing to do with doing just with females. it literally said "If you fear injust with Orphans/vulnerable" not females here.
1 / 0Unpopular opinion: Justinian is what ignorants think Constantine isLet me explain. The idea that the Trinity or the biblical canon were chosen in the Council of Nicaea is pure nonsense. Constantine himself was sympathetic towards Arianism and was baptized by an Arian. He had no theological knowledge whatsoever so he couldn't just force the bishops (who 20 years before that had been fleeing massacre by emperors Diocletian and Galerius) to accept doctrines contrary to the ones they were dying for. He actually just wanted turmoil to stop between Christian sects, as much as in the end he weaponized Christianity
Justinian, on the contrary, was a fanatic that wanted to be able to control a vast empire, one in which religious unity would be important. So he had to use it to control his people. Let's not forget this guy thought he was the most important man of the universe. He kidnapped two popes (allowing one of them to starve to death) so he believed himself to be the highest religious authority although he was a layman. He basically let Rome and Italy starving and the great city lost 90% of its population very much because of his cruelty. And last, he anathematized Origen, the greatest Church Father, who happened to believe Apokatastasis. Now everyone thinks that eternal conscious torment was always the standard view of Christianity. I'm yet to find where in the Bible it is said that "the wages of sin is eternal hell" but yeah, thank you, Justinian.
Justinian, on the contrary, was a fanatic that wanted to be able to control a vast empire, one in which religious unity would be important. So he had to use it to control his people. Let's not forget this guy thought he was the most important man of the universe. He kidnapped two popes (allowing one of them to starve to death) so he believed himself to be the highest religious authority although he was a layman. He basically let Rome and Italy starving and the great city lost 90% of its population very much because of his cruelty. And last, he anathematized Origen, the greatest Church Father, who happened to believe Apokatastasis. Now everyone thinks that eternal conscious torment was always the standard view of Christianity. I'm yet to find where in the Bible it is said that "the wages of sin is eternal hell" but yeah, thank you, Justinian.
1 / 0And fear a Day when no soul will suffice for another soul at all, nor will intercession be accepted from it, nor will compensation be taken from it, nor will they be aided.
https://quranenc.com/en/browse/english_saheeh/2
https://quranenc.com/en/browse/engl
46 / 7Most Atheists are Christians.Let me explain.
Most Atheists are Mechanistic Materialists, which isn't based in science but Christian metaphysics.
Mechanistic Materialism was influenced by Aristotle's concept of a substance as being a "thing-in-itself," having an unchanging "essence." The core of substance theory is that independent existence, permanence, and timelessness are the foundation of reality, with these notions mutually implying each other: what is permanent about things is what endures despite temporal interaction with the rest of the universe: what separates itself from all else.
This is also the reason why the Christian God is very commonly described as timeless and unchanging.
Descartes developed this into his substance dualism, where mind and matter are the two fundamental substances, with mind being non-physical and able to exist independently of the physical body.
The world of matter was comprised of entirely deterministic and mechanical linear cause-effect relations, such as a chain of falling dominoes. Humans were spared from the fate of determinism because they had immaterial souls. Descartes popularized the view that non-human animals were literally unconscious automata.
So therefore Mechanistic Materialism is merely decapitated Cartesian Dualism - a Greco-Abrahamic metaphysics. Therefore most Atheists are Christians. It doesn't matter if they explicitly "believe" in materialism or not, their worldview will usually be some flavor of assumed materialism.
Most Atheists are Mechanistic Materialists, which isn't based in science but Christian metaphysics.
Mechanistic Materialism was influenced by Aristotle's concept of a substance as being a "thing-in-itself," having an unchanging "essence." The core of substance theory is that independent existence, permanence, and timelessness are the foundation of reality, with these notions mutually implying each other: what is permanent about things is what endures despite temporal interaction with the rest of the universe: what separates itself from all else.
This is also the reason why the Christian God is very commonly described as timeless and unchanging.
Descartes developed this into his substance dualism, where mind and matter are the two fundamental substances, with mind being non-physical and able to exist independently of the physical body.
The world of matter was comprised of entirely deterministic and mechanical linear cause-effect relations, such as a chain of falling dominoes. Humans were spared from the fate of determinism because they had immaterial souls. Descartes popularized the view that non-human animals were literally unconscious automata.
So therefore Mechanistic Materialism is merely decapitated Cartesian Dualism - a Greco-Abrahamic metaphysics. Therefore most Atheists are Christians. It doesn't matter if they explicitly "believe" in materialism or not, their worldview will usually be some flavor of assumed materialism.
1 / 0This world honors the godless, in the he day of judgement you will see those who this world honored with respect and admiration bering tested like if they they were nothing, and those who are he would though were nothing being treated with feet honors and respect.
The last will be the first and the bottom will be the top.
The last will be the first and the bottom will be the top.
10 / 2So apparently YHWH was once a pagan god.
He had a wife and was the son of Elohim, who had many children including Baal (the one people sacrificed their children to), then the religion became monotheist, and even when they refer to other gods, they say the most powerful one is YHWH
My question is
Do you think other polytheist religions could become monotheist over time? Like in precolombine Mexico, there were many gods but the aztecs were followers mostly of Huitzilopochtli.
Do you think if giving the time, the aztec religion could become monotheist? I've red that even in ancient Egypt there was a time when they were monotheists.
He had a wife and was the son of Elohim, who had many children including Baal (the one people sacrificed their children to), then the religion became monotheist, and even when they refer to other gods, they say the most powerful one is YHWH
My question is
Do you think other polytheist religions could become monotheist over time? Like in precolombine Mexico, there were many gods but the aztecs were followers mostly of Huitzilopochtli.
Do you think if giving the time, the aztec religion could become monotheist? I've red that even in ancient Egypt there was a time when they were monotheists.
0 / 0And among them are unlettered ones who do not know the Scripture except [indulgement in] wishful thinking, but they are only assuming.
https://quranenc.com/en/browse/english_saheeh/2
https://quranenc.com/en/browse/engl
9 / 5Daddy, chill!If the juries still out on Charlie, we can at least all agree that this clown had it coming... right /his/?
6 / 1You don't have anxiety or depression, you're being tormented by a demon. A wicked spirit is torturing you and it is convincing you to do evil and to hate God and blame him for your suffering so that nobody can save you from it. Because the more you hate God and the more evil you imagine the more it is allowed to torture you.
Your life sucks because you hate God, not the other way around.
Your life sucks because you hate God, not the other way around.
4 / 0East SwedesHow do East Swedes differ form mainland Swedes, or is there even any difference other than dialects?
61 / 8King Charles I did nothing wrong. The literal definition of "treason" at the time of his trial meant, "Violence against the King" so it would have been impossible for him to be guilty of the charge the House of Commons set against him in the first place.
8 / 2Wait a minute, protestants dont read the Catholic Bible?
All they read is the KJV Bible where 7 books are missing?
So much for Sola Scriptura.
Have fun and enjoy hell.
All they read is the KJV Bible where 7 books are missing?
So much for Sola Scriptura.
Have fun and enjoy hell.
1 / 0>aliens come to earth and pick one person at random
>they say that if humans have the capacity for evil, they will destroy the whole planet
>they ask the person "do humans have the capacity for evil?"
>that person, a Kantian, says "Yes!", because lying is objectivelly morally wrong
>the whole planet is destroyed and everyone dies
Kantians think this is a good outcome from the hypothetical.
Discuss.
>they say that if humans have the capacity for evil, they will destroy the whole planet
>they ask the person "do humans have the capacity for evil?"
>that person, a Kantian, says "Yes!", because lying is objectivelly morally wrong
>the whole planet is destroyed and everyone dies
Kantians think this is a good outcome from the hypothetical.
Discuss.
64 / 4What prevents atheists from walking down the street and murdering random people for no reason?
24 / 4Why do atheists enjoy crushing the hopes and dreams of ordinary, everyday people?
What do they get out of spoiling people's beliefs?
Everywhere they go they scream "God's not real, MAN". As if they were a young school boy, going on and on about how there's no such thing as St. Nicholas.
They seem to be unable to let people believe in things
What is the historical explanation for this?
What do they get out of spoiling people's beliefs?
Everywhere they go they scream "God's not real, MAN". As if they were a young school boy, going on and on about how there's no such thing as St. Nicholas.
They seem to be unable to let people believe in things
What is the historical explanation for this?
16 / 5Religion is a virus and a stain. It has held humanity back in every turn.
Someone being religious is a big sign that they are in fact, retarded.
Someone being religious is a big sign that they are in fact, retarded.
34 / 7A lot of lost texts would be awesome if they were found. Like Porphyry's "Against the Christians", it was a colossal 15 volume work taking attacking every aspect of Christianity from a philosophical and historical perspective. Porphyry had access to sources that we don't have, like histories of the Phoenecians (he was from Tyre himself). It was considered so searing that multiple Christian emperors had it banned and every copy burned, even mentioning his arguments was banned so books Christians wrote to rebut it didn't survive either. We've only got a few fragments via quotations, and even from those we know he prefigured a lot of what was later independently discovered by academic Biblical study, e.g. the book of Daniel being written during the reign of Antiochus Epiphanes (160s BC), not during the Babylonian exile.
4 / 1What are some examples of authors disavowing their early works?
Uruguayan author Eduardo Galeano wrote "The Open Veins of Latin America" in 1971 and the book instantly became a huge hit throughout Latin America and Europe.
The left embraced it as the definitive history of Latin America, that described perfectly how the white man had exploited and genocided the native peoples of Latin America. It sold millions of copies worldwide.
But not long before his death Galeano publicly expressed that he had written the book at a time he was very young and his knowledge of economics and politics was still very poor, saying he wouldn't read it again as he was ashamed of it.
PS: his actual name was Eduadro Hughes, but he changed it to Galeano to appear less white European
Uruguayan author Eduardo Galeano wrote "The Open Veins of Latin America" in 1971 and the book instantly became a huge hit throughout Latin America and Europe.
The left embraced it as the definitive history of Latin America, that described perfectly how the white man had exploited and genocided the native peoples of Latin America. It sold millions of copies worldwide.
But not long before his death Galeano publicly expressed that he had written the book at a time he was very young and his knowledge of economics and politics was still very poor, saying he wouldn't read it again as he was ashamed of it.
PS: his actual name was Eduadro Hughes, but he changed it to Galeano to appear less white European
3 / 1>Soviets could have won the western front without Lend LeaseDaily reminder that le red army was a disorganized rabble of churka rapists who needed western industrial might and a joint invasion to limp through the war. The USSR was the sick man of the allied powers.
25 / 4Okay I'm not being racist or anything, but you're here to tell me that black people aren't monkeys or descended from monkeys even though chimps live in Africa and ancient humans like Homo Habilis were primates? Look I'm not being /pol/ or racist, but come on, black people are monkeys. And that's not a bad thing, but historically speaking, they should be considered primates because of how they evolved with other primates and ancient humans.
2 / 0Were berserkers therians?Serious question. Did berserkers have elements of therianism or even proto-furry elements? They identified very strongly with wolves and bears, even often invoking these animals in their names (especially wolves).
188 / 1920th century LondonLondon used to be a high trust community with low crime, however by the early 00s it was no longer and crime had skyrocketed.
What brought about this change?
What brought about this change?
26 / 4If you look at it seriously Greek/Roman mythology is literally the most boring and retarded religion ever even fucking Islam is cooler. Not a Trad btw but any one of Christianity's goofy sects is also way more interesting than this shit which is why they replaced the Greek/Roman gods. There's no substance there's nothing interesting unlike say Zoroastrianism or Buddhism it's just pure 80 IQ slop with naked marble statues that sure look pretty. I also don't have ethnonationalist reasons to do Greek/Roman apologia since my ancestors are from Northern Europe and I'm not into wewuzzery.
63 / 2Were most Christian conversions in Europe illegitimate?Mark 6:11
>And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, when ye depart thence, shake off the dust under your feet for a testimony against them. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.
What actually happened:
>Conversion to Christianity met great opposition among the Bulgarian elite. Some refused to become Christians while others apostatized after baptism and started a rebellion against Boris for forcing them to be baptized. Some people did not object necessarily to the Christian religion but to the fact that it was brought by foreign priests, which, as a result, established external foreign policy. By breaking the power of the old cults, Boris reduced the influence of the boyars, who resisted the khan's authority. In the summer of 865 a group of Bulgar aristocrats (boyars) started an open revolt. Boris ruthlessly suppressed it and executed 52 boyars together with their entire families. Thus the Christianization continued.
>In 889 Boris abdicated the throne and became a monk. His son and successor Vladimir attempted a pagan reaction, which brought Boris out of retirement in 893. Vladimir was defeated and Boris had him blinded, his wife shaved and sent to a monastery. Boris gathered the Council of Preslav placing his third son, Tsar Simeon I of Bulgaria, on the throne, threatening him with the same fate if he too apostatized.
And that person was a monk at that.
>And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, when ye depart thence, shake off the dust under your feet for a testimony against them. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.
What actually happened:
>Conversion to Christianity met great opposition among the Bulgarian elite. Some refused to become Christians while others apostatized after baptism and started a rebellion against Boris for forcing them to be baptized. Some people did not object necessarily to the Christian religion but to the fact that it was brought by foreign priests, which, as a result, established external foreign policy. By breaking the power of the old cults, Boris reduced the influence of the boyars, who resisted the khan's authority. In the summer of 865 a group of Bulgar aristocrats (boyars) started an open revolt. Boris ruthlessly suppressed it and executed 52 boyars together with their entire families. Thus the Christianization continued.
>In 889 Boris abdicated the throne and became a monk. His son and successor Vladimir attempted a pagan reaction, which brought Boris out of retirement in 893. Vladimir was defeated and Boris had him blinded, his wife shaved and sent to a monastery. Boris gathered the Council of Preslav placing his third son, Tsar Simeon I of Bulgaria, on the throne, threatening him with the same fate if he too apostatized.
And that person was a monk at that.
5 / 0P1: If god exists, he exists in all possible worlds.
P2: There is a possible world where god does not exist.
C: God does not exist.
P2: There is a possible world where god does not exist.
C: God does not exist.
2 / 0Why do Pentecostals worship modern Israel??Matthew 21:43 states that "Therefore I tell you that the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people who will produce its fruit". This verse, spoken by Jesus, signifies that the Kingdom of God will no longer belong to the jews who rejected Him, but will be given to a new "nation" (or people) that will live in accordance with God's will and produce spiritual "fruit".
6 / 0They are the source of Greek Intellectualism and Judeo-Christian religion. Why does it make Ba'athists seethe when they align themselves with the West? Shouldn't a father be with his children?
25 / 1EUROPEAN PAGANISM IS JEWISHA recent archaeological discovery, documented in Peterson et. al published to the Journal of Ancient European History in June 2024, reveals a collection of papyri, labeled <<F1-F23>.
The papyri in question document the travels of a band of Babylonian Jews, ~2,800 large traveling to Europe, carrying with them what spread through Europe, and, once pollinated, expanded into Norse, Greek, etc. paganism.
Christ is King.
The papyri in question document the travels of a band of Babylonian Jews, ~2,800 large traveling to Europe, carrying with them what spread through Europe, and, once pollinated, expanded into Norse, Greek, etc. paganism.
Christ is King.
3 / 0How common was mountaineering before the 19th century?Did people who lived in the alps during the middle ages bother going up the mountains?
1 / 0Sola scriptura with extra steps>the bible is not the end-all-be-all of Christianity
>however, no writing or statement made by the church's leaders may go against the Bible
>however, no writing or statement made by the church's leaders may go against the Bible
0 / 0Wait a minute, All Christians except American, Australian, Filipino, & Korean Christians dont circumcise their baby boys?
St. PETER said in Galatians 2:11-14, "You need to be circumcised to go to heaven."
Have fun and enjoy Hell
St. PETER said in Galatians 2:11-14, "You need to be circumcised to go to heaven."
Have fun and enjoy Hell
14 / 5Comfort WomenI've seen enough decensored JAV to know they couldn't have been suffering from the punishment they claimed.
20 / 2I wish there were kinos about the Northern CrusadesLefties don't like them because it was settler colonialism by religious fanatics, righties don't like them because they killed whites and worshiped a Jew - but this period was so cool. It was like Medieval Europe's own Wild West full of mystery, opportunity, and primal brutality on both sides. Bringing out the worst in the fight for raw survival. Just imagine these brick castles surrounded by swamps and birch and pine forests. All of the clothes and characters VGHHHHHHH
13 / 2I am ONCE AGAIN asking /his/ to explain to me, a non Yorkist, why Richard III was "bad" or any worse than Henry T*dor?
>Richard III was a usurper
>Richard III killed those kids in the tower
>Henry T*dor brought peace and stability
>Richard III was the worst king ever
Why is it like this? I still haven't received a coherent explanation as to why one usurper is good in one scenario but bad in another
>inb4 Yorkist
The Yorkists had the better claim. The House of York was more senior than anything else and the Duke of Clarence’s claim came down to Richard III by the Mortimers. The Beauforts were bastards and don’t count as conferring a valid claim to the throne for Henry T*dor. Richard III had proven himself time and time again as an administrator and warrior. He would have been a great king and solved all of the instability just as good as Henry T*dor if he wasn’t mercilessly murdered by a power hungry upstart. Henry T*dor caused even more rebellions and intrigue actually. Henry T*dor had people executed who didn’t deserve it. Richard III probably didn’t even kill those kids in the tower. Those kids would’ve lost the crown and caused chaos anyway, so it would have been a good thing anyway.
>y-you're a Plantagenet
i'm a Stanley
>Richard III was a usurper
>Richard III killed those kids in the tower
>Henry T*dor brought peace and stability
>Richard III was the worst king ever
Why is it like this? I still haven't received a coherent explanation as to why one usurper is good in one scenario but bad in another
>inb4 Yorkist
The Yorkists had the better claim. The House of York was more senior than anything else and the Duke of Clarence’s claim came down to Richard III by the Mortimers. The Beauforts were bastards and don’t count as conferring a valid claim to the throne for Henry T*dor. Richard III had proven himself time and time again as an administrator and warrior. He would have been a great king and solved all of the instability just as good as Henry T*dor if he wasn’t mercilessly murdered by a power hungry upstart. Henry T*dor caused even more rebellions and intrigue actually. Henry T*dor had people executed who didn’t deserve it. Richard III probably didn’t even kill those kids in the tower. Those kids would’ve lost the crown and caused chaos anyway, so it would have been a good thing anyway.
>y-you're a Plantagenet
i'm a Stanley
10 / 0I'm not convinced the zodiac killer was one person. I think it was a fictitious construction by the SFPD
108 / 12If you know someone is a socialist, then one question will clarify any remaining doubts you have about their particular ideology:
>When did the USSR go wrong?
Their answer tells more about them than any self-identifying descriptor. From Left SR uprising to Gorbachev, every strain of leftist has a fierce opinion on this question.
>When did the USSR go wrong?
Their answer tells more about them than any self-identifying descriptor. From Left SR uprising to Gorbachev, every strain of leftist has a fierce opinion on this question.
1 / 0Orthodox Christian Toll HousesCan I get an Orthobro to fill me on purgatorial toll houses?
This shit literally sounds like Egyptian "balance the scales" works based theology.
This shit literally sounds like Egyptian "balance the scales" works based theology.
17 / 0How does capitalism contend with the conundrum of AI technology replacing the need for human employees? It will strike white collar jobs and blue collar jobs alike. How can the system survive if consumers cannot work to provide capital for themselves?
5 / 0If you claim to be a Christian but you don't observe the Sabbath, then you're no Christian at all.
5 / 1John Brown was the most based man of the 19th century.There is nothing more holy than fighting for a righteous cause, and is there any cause more righteous than destroying the most evil institution in the world: slavery?
Brown wanted to be "the American Moses," and considering that the raid on Harper's Ferry was one of the major instigators of the Civil War, which itself resulted in the abolition of that most evil form of cruelty, I would say he succeeded in his goal.
Brown wanted to be "the American Moses," and considering that the raid on Harper's Ferry was one of the major instigators of the Civil War, which itself resulted in the abolition of that most evil form of cruelty, I would say he succeeded in his goal.
9 / 1Does Odin forbid me from gooning? Thinking about returning to my ancestral gods away from YHWH who complains about me beating it to anime cosplayers.
11 / 4Christians are satanicI have never met more evil, cruel, hateful, spiritually dead people than christians. They are literal demons.
36 / 5During slavery why wasn't it seen as acceptable for white women to take sexual advantage but it was acceptable for white men to do it?
27 / 2Neither the Holy Roman Empire nor the Eastern Roman Empire were Roman because they were Christian. Only pagans who worship gods like Jupiter, Mars, etc can be considered Roman.
The Roman Empire died in 363 AD when emperor Julian failed to stop the Christianization of the Roman Empire. In fact, Christianity allowed brainrot like iconoclasm and arianism/mono-/miaphysitism disputes instead on focus on state-building, which would eventually lead to the collapse of Rome.
The Roman Empire died in 363 AD when emperor Julian failed to stop the Christianization of the Roman Empire. In fact, Christianity allowed brainrot like iconoclasm and arianism/mono-/miaphysitism disputes instead on focus on state-building, which would eventually lead to the collapse of Rome.
34 / 7What would a Roman industrial revolution look like? How would it evolve?Romeaboos always talk about how close they were to an industrial revolution had it not been for those Christcucks/political instability/whatever. I don't fully buy this idea because there were many things going on in Britain that led them to their Industrial Revolution (one of the most important factors being harsh competition against other neighboring countries, something the Romans lacked since they beat Carthage).
But let's say the ancient Romans could industrialize. How would it happen? What would happen afterwards? Would we be exploring galaxies by now, or would it stagnate for hundreds of years? Would it be better or worse than the British industrial revolution? What about environmental effects?
But let's say the ancient Romans could industrialize. How would it happen? What would happen afterwards? Would we be exploring galaxies by now, or would it stagnate for hundreds of years? Would it be better or worse than the British industrial revolution? What about environmental effects?
27 / 4The Communist Plague: Could it have been preventedTheoretically, if we went back to the end of the WW2, if America refused the help of Russia, would that have killed Communism? As it were, the freedom fighters of America were hijacked and, for instance, any criticism of ugly art is painted as being fascist.
Even today, the topic of Commie vs Nazi overtakes the American born liberty arguments.
Pic unrelated
Even today, the topic of Commie vs Nazi overtakes the American born liberty arguments.
Pic unrelated
11 / 1Satanism is a retarded christian paradoxI don't think christians realize how retarded the concept of satanism is. Christian often like to call other people satanists. They talk about how people from another religion are satanists, or how maybe some members of the elite (the "illuminati") are satanists, etc, but they fail to realize the utter retardation of their own claims.
Satanism is per definition a christian belief. In order to be a satanist, you have to be a christian. You simply cannot believe in satan is you don't believe in the christian religion, just like how you cannot believe that gandalf is real, if you don't believe that the lord of the rings story is real.
So the entire concept of satanism becomes a retarded paradox. You can only be a satanist if you are a christian, but if you are a christian, then why the fuck would you listen to "the bad guy" who ends up giving you a shitty life, instead of the good guy that gives you a good life? It doesn't make any sense at all.
The people that you call satanists aren't actually satanists, ok? Satan is a fictional character within YOUR religion. People that dont believe in YOUR story, don't worship characters that only exist in your story. How can this be so hard to understand?
And then sure, there are the people who call themselves "satanists" like the people shown in my picture, but we all know these people don't actually believe in satan or any of that shit. These are literally just edgy atheist teenagers who try to piss off the conservative environment that they grew up in. Satanism simply does not actually exist. It's a paradox.
Satanism is per definition a christian belief. In order to be a satanist, you have to be a christian. You simply cannot believe in satan is you don't believe in the christian religion, just like how you cannot believe that gandalf is real, if you don't believe that the lord of the rings story is real.
So the entire concept of satanism becomes a retarded paradox. You can only be a satanist if you are a christian, but if you are a christian, then why the fuck would you listen to "the bad guy" who ends up giving you a shitty life, instead of the good guy that gives you a good life? It doesn't make any sense at all.
The people that you call satanists aren't actually satanists, ok? Satan is a fictional character within YOUR religion. People that dont believe in YOUR story, don't worship characters that only exist in your story. How can this be so hard to understand?
And then sure, there are the people who call themselves "satanists" like the people shown in my picture, but we all know these people don't actually believe in satan or any of that shit. These are literally just edgy atheist teenagers who try to piss off the conservative environment that they grew up in. Satanism simply does not actually exist. It's a paradox.
0 / 0Were do holy people come from anyway?Why holy people are important and have to be treated well and valued opinion givers of earth. They just know, a regular person just doesn't. And they are what regular people ask for so, why complain? If you dont like arrogant, strong, big, violent, or possibly any of those people, you are an idiot because all true leaders and holy leaders will most likely have some of those qualities. Yes, they come for the left too, but the left chooses to not let any of those have a productive life if they can because they want a population without guidance or the natural good of everything taking care of them.
5 / 0>Epistle of Barnabas (c. 130 AD)
Because of this fucking text the so called "Christians" stop observing the Sabbath.
It is obvious to me that wrongdoers amongst Christians pushed this.
>Ignatius of Antioch (early 2nd century)
This fucking clown was also preaching the rejection of the Sabbath.
>Emperor Constantine (321 AD)
This idiot issued a civil decree making Sunday a day of rest from labor for urban dwellers.
>Council of Laodicea (c. 363–364 AD)
Now check this out: this council officially prohibited Christians from “Judaizing” by resting on the Sabbath (Saturday), and commanded rest on the Lord’s Day (Sunday) instead.
A big fuck you to this non-Christian Church.
Because of this fucking text the so called "Christians" stop observing the Sabbath.
It is obvious to me that wrongdoers amongst Christians pushed this.
>Ignatius of Antioch (early 2nd century)
This fucking clown was also preaching the rejection of the Sabbath.
>Emperor Constantine (321 AD)
This idiot issued a civil decree making Sunday a day of rest from labor for urban dwellers.
>Council of Laodicea (c. 363–364 AD)
Now check this out: this council officially prohibited Christians from “Judaizing” by resting on the Sabbath (Saturday), and commanded rest on the Lord’s Day (Sunday) instead.
A big fuck you to this non-Christian Church.
3 / 0Ego and GodI just had this cool idea for how existence works. It's just a thought and I have no idea if it's real but I thought it was interesting and kind of has some logic to it.
If God is infinite and omnipotent, it makes some sense that to experience subjectivity and meaning, God would make a limited reality full of laws and rules and take small parts of his infinite self and put them in this reality as souls of beings in order to experience it from their limited perspective.
Now a fragment of infinity is still infinite. Imagine that after a being dies the soul is now freed from the limits of the reality but retains it's ego. It is an infinite part of the God that created them, meaning that it is God and is now omnipotent. They are an individual and God at the same time, and the "larger" God that originally created them still experiences everything that they do. The experiences they have accumulated as individuals in life, their desires, and so on would probably make everyone go nuts fulfilling their own fantasies in increasingly depraved ways, but eventually you'd be bored of that because it is ultimately meaningless without the limitations of reality to give the experiences context and value.
You then create a new reality and divide small parts of your infinite self as souls inhabiting beings in this world, to experience the reality you made from their subjective point of view. This reality could likely be very different from the one you lived in since you have your own unique perspective. You gain new experiences from the souls living there, and the God that created you also gain new experiences through you. Each part of you that you separated as a soul in this world also becomes a new omnipotent being when it dies that continues the cycle and creates its own unique reality and gives both you experiences through it, and also the being that created you. So your egos unique perspective evolves Gods perspective endlessly and exponentially.
What do you think?
If God is infinite and omnipotent, it makes some sense that to experience subjectivity and meaning, God would make a limited reality full of laws and rules and take small parts of his infinite self and put them in this reality as souls of beings in order to experience it from their limited perspective.
Now a fragment of infinity is still infinite. Imagine that after a being dies the soul is now freed from the limits of the reality but retains it's ego. It is an infinite part of the God that created them, meaning that it is God and is now omnipotent. They are an individual and God at the same time, and the "larger" God that originally created them still experiences everything that they do. The experiences they have accumulated as individuals in life, their desires, and so on would probably make everyone go nuts fulfilling their own fantasies in increasingly depraved ways, but eventually you'd be bored of that because it is ultimately meaningless without the limitations of reality to give the experiences context and value.
You then create a new reality and divide small parts of your infinite self as souls inhabiting beings in this world, to experience the reality you made from their subjective point of view. This reality could likely be very different from the one you lived in since you have your own unique perspective. You gain new experiences from the souls living there, and the God that created you also gain new experiences through you. Each part of you that you separated as a soul in this world also becomes a new omnipotent being when it dies that continues the cycle and creates its own unique reality and gives both you experiences through it, and also the being that created you. So your egos unique perspective evolves Gods perspective endlessly and exponentially.
What do you think?
9 / 0Historically speaking, how come there was never any serious Scottish independence movements on the level of Ireland?
14 / 1FDR was the last president to be fluent in multiple languagesFluent in French and German as well as English.
Is there something lost by the fact since the advent of Television our politicians have to be theatrical show men as opposed to well learned scholars and hard workers?
Is there something lost by the fact since the advent of Television our politicians have to be theatrical show men as opposed to well learned scholars and hard workers?
17 / 7Three Primary Races of EuropeWhen Young Dryas, the last glacial maximum, ended at around 12,500 yrs ago, much of Europe was barren and uninhabited. The Mongol race survived the harshest winters of the maximal ice age in Siberia. They were able to endure the coldest temperatures and had larger brains. Archaeological evidences prove that the Mongolian race started living in Europe 11,000 yrs ago. The remnant of original European Mongols are known as Finns and Estonians.
In addition, the Anatolian race received advanced technologies and farming method from the Nephilim, the race of giants. They built advanced civilizations in the Anatolian high grounds and were soon able to expand in the Western Europe as well as into Persia. Modern day genetic studies show that Italians, Greeks, Spaniards, Portuguese, Turks and Iranians are racially Anatolian, not Aryan.
However, around 5000 yrs ago, the Aryan race started expanding from Southern Russia. They had chariots, horses, cows, carts, wheels, and advanced bronze weaponry and armor. They conquered the Anatolian civilization of Hatti in Anatolia and built the Hittite Empire, the first Aryan civilization. When Aryans arrived in Europe, Europe was already divided into two races: Mongolian in Eastern and Northern Europe, and Anatolian in Southern and Western Europe.
In addition, the Anatolian race received advanced technologies and farming method from the Nephilim, the race of giants. They built advanced civilizations in the Anatolian high grounds and were soon able to expand in the Western Europe as well as into Persia. Modern day genetic studies show that Italians, Greeks, Spaniards, Portuguese, Turks and Iranians are racially Anatolian, not Aryan.
However, around 5000 yrs ago, the Aryan race started expanding from Southern Russia. They had chariots, horses, cows, carts, wheels, and advanced bronze weaponry and armor. They conquered the Anatolian civilization of Hatti in Anatolia and built the Hittite Empire, the first Aryan civilization. When Aryans arrived in Europe, Europe was already divided into two races: Mongolian in Eastern and Northern Europe, and Anatolian in Southern and Western Europe.
7 / 0why prevents us, as men, to be as bold as love
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYxfOxjswxc&si=UCgfo7aq1EfPuiLY
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=Z
6 / 0>smoke some opium
>mobilize a Mongolian hoard
>kill communists
>blame the jews
>smoke more opium
>hoard claims you are the reincarnation of Genghis Khan
>proclaim a new Holy Mongolian Empire
>smoke more opium
>cavalry charge a tank corp
>route them
>they need reinforcements
>get captured
>executed
how can one man be so based?
>mobilize a Mongolian hoard
>kill communists
>blame the jews
>smoke more opium
>hoard claims you are the reincarnation of Genghis Khan
>proclaim a new Holy Mongolian Empire
>smoke more opium
>cavalry charge a tank corp
>route them
>they need reinforcements
>get captured
>executed
how can one man be so based?
8 / 0Hypothetical question...if I took a baby and removed it's prefrontal cortex so that it couldn't think (and thus do anything or think bad thoughts) strapped it down to a bed and fed it introveniously....no I don't think it would live indefinitely, yet I think judaic theology says it would...am I missing something here
0 / 0>And it came to pass, as soon as he came nigh unto the camp, that he saw the calf, and the dancing: and Moses' anger waxed hot, and he cast the tables out of his hands, and brake them beneath the mount.
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Exodus-Chapter-32/#19
The text says he threw the tablets down at the foot of the mountain, breaking them. This act wasn’t out of disrespect for the law, but a symbolic breaking of the covenant because the people had already broken it by idolatry. The broken tablets signify that the original covenant was shattered by their betrayal.
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.or
The text says he threw the tablets down at the foot of the mountain, breaking them. This act wasn’t out of disrespect for the law, but a symbolic breaking of the covenant because the people had already broken it by idolatry. The broken tablets signify that the original covenant was shattered by their betrayal.
11 / 0Climatic determinism is true, there is a reason why the most developed countries aren't in jungles or hot places
There is a reason why Japan, Korea and China are better than South Asia or India.
There's a reason why Europe is better than North Africa, and even north Africa is better than the rest of Africa.
Is the climate, the limitations and the suplies forges civilizations.
There is a reason why Japan, Korea and China are better than South Asia or India.
There's a reason why Europe is better than North Africa, and even north Africa is better than the rest of Africa.
Is the climate, the limitations and the suplies forges civilizations.
45 / 6AmericaWhich is the biggest stain on America? Historically speaking of course.
>Genocide of Natives
>Slavery
>Genocide of Natives
>Slavery
12 / 2Baron Ungern was an anti-communist general in the Russian Civil War and then an independent warlord who intervened in Mongolia against China. A part of the Russian Empire's Baltic German minority, Ungern was an ultraconservative monarchist who aspired to restore the Russian monarchy after the 1917 Russian Revolutions and to revive the Mongol Empire under the rule of the Bogd Khan. His attraction to Vajrayana Buddhism and his eccentric, often violent, treatment of enemies and his own men earned him the sobriquet "the Mad Baron" or "the Bloody Baron". He was viewed by his Mongolian subjects during his rule as the "God of War".
11 / 1There's nothing wrong with porn or promiscuity, sex is just for pleasure and it doesn't harm anyone if you're a whore/manwhore.
8 / 0The doctrine of sola fide is false.if you must believe in sola fide to be saved, then you're contradicting sola fide.
If salvation is through faith alone, then having to believe salvation is through faith alone is more than faith alone.
If salvation is through faith alone, then having to believe salvation is through faith alone is more than faith alone.
4 / 0Original Christianity:
>Jesus is returning soon!
>Everyone will be bodily resurrected from the dead
>We will all live on the New Earth as was intended in the Garden of Eden
Copeianity after Jesus failed to return for 2,000 years:
>It actually doesn't matter when Jesus will return, that was a metaphor
>You aren't resurrect, your disembodied soul just floats to heaven after you die
>Everyone will live in the sky on a cloud forever
>Jesus is returning soon!
>Everyone will be bodily resurrected from the dead
>We will all live on the New Earth as was intended in the Garden of Eden
Copeianity after Jesus failed to return for 2,000 years:
>It actually doesn't matter when Jesus will return, that was a metaphor
>You aren't resurrect, your disembodied soul just floats to heaven after you die
>Everyone will live in the sky on a cloud forever
0 / 0Blessed be the Lord Yahu Sabaoth, the awesome God of Israel, for he has taken the spirit of lust away from me.
85 / 12Haplogroup HistoryInstead of grouping people by culture and attempting to associate haplogroups with them, why not treat haplogroups as the source of truth and then associate cultures with them?
This map covers Y Haplogroup movement up to 8000 BC, which means it is tracking all of the male bloodlines.
Full video with more time periods here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ru3Vkjvt_g
What do you notice?
A couple things I notice off the bad:
- P comes from Southeast Asia, then moves up into central Asia and becomes R. That's the origin of R!
- R expansion really begins around 12k BC, which is around the start of the Meltwater Pulse 1A. They may be either moving away from a flooded area or moving into areas that were wrecked by floods, crop failure, and chaos. If R is a raiding culture, then it makes sense they would move in at this time.
This map covers Y Haplogroup movement up to 8000 BC, which means it is tracking all of the male bloodlines.
Full video with more time periods here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ru
What do you notice?
A couple things I notice off the bad:
- P comes from Southeast Asia, then moves up into central Asia and becomes R. That's the origin of R!
- R expansion really begins around 12k BC, which is around the start of the Meltwater Pulse 1A. They may be either moving away from a flooded area or moving into areas that were wrecked by floods, crop failure, and chaos. If R is a raiding culture, then it makes sense they would move in at this time.
0 / 0Why do Westerners have more angular pointy faces?I noticed that all my girlfriends (British American) had more angular pointy facial features especially with the nose and jaw that contrasted with my wide round face with high cheekbones and smallish eyes
6 / 0I've been to many different churches in my time. Why do so many able-bodied men do this shit? Take it in your hands like a man
21 / 1The Bible is the only Word of God
Everything in it is perfect and it contains no errors
Stay mad, everyone else!
Everything in it is perfect and it contains no errors
Stay mad, everyone else!
176 / 18Is this image even true? It seems disingenuous at best, I've read a bunch of books from ancient greece and don't remember gay sex coming up at any point, why does the image include Chamides but not what he says in the laws? Why does it include Philo describing the symposium? Hoping the reader thinks he is talking about Plato having real life pedo parties rather than the dialogue? Why is Plutarch accepted as fact when hes the only guy who said that and he started saying it 400 years after? I also remember 99% of the so called gay greek pottery submitted wasnt even gay and was just the guy trying to pull a fast one
11 / 0What are some Rome/Latin original myths?Before the Romans adopted and grafted the Greek myths onto their own, what myths did they have? And I am sorry if my question is not well put.
35 / 5Do Eastern Catholics use books non-canonical to Catholics but canonical to Eastern and/ or Oriental Orthodox in their worship such as liturgies and Daily Office? These books and ‘books’ would be 1 and 2 Esdras, 3 and 4 Maccabees, Psalm 151, and The Prayer of Mannaseh (added somewhere to 2 Chronicles AKA Paralipomenon, I think).
I know that 2 Esdras (AKA 4 Esrdas, AKA 3 Esdras) is used in the Traditional Latin Mass for the introits of a a Requiem Mass and Pentecost Tuesday (as per Wikipedia).
I know that 2 Esdras (AKA 4 Esrdas, AKA 3 Esdras) is used in the Traditional Latin Mass for the introits of a a Requiem Mass and Pentecost Tuesday (as per Wikipedia).
5 / 0What prevents christians from walking down the street and murdering random people for no reason and then repenting and asking for forgiveness?
41 / 5Christianity is WHITE.Yes, you heard it. Everyone from Moses to King Solomon to Matthew to Gideon to Judas to John of Patmos is White. Not Jewish.
We have countless hours of scientific work and examination from scholars like Langdon Eckhart, Liam Matter, Michael H. Cramer, etc. and they ALL point to Christianity being 100% White.
For example, a study by Liam Matter published in the Journal Of Ancient Religious History, a journal with an IP of 20.4, reveals that the Apostle Paul's birth record was in GERMANY, and he was born in a town which is now part of modern-day Berlin.
We also know Jesus was FINNISH, not Jewish. He was born in modern-day Helsinki. In fact, JERUSALEM IS AN EARLIER FORM OF HELSINKI. THEY ARE THE SAME LOCATION.
Jerusalem = Herusalem --> Herusale --> Helasal --> Helsinki
Praise Christ. Fuck LARPagans. EUROPEAN PAGANISM is Jewish, NOT Christianity.
Debate me. I dare you.
We have countless hours of scientific work and examination from scholars like Langdon Eckhart, Liam Matter, Michael H. Cramer, etc. and they ALL point to Christianity being 100% White.
For example, a study by Liam Matter published in the Journal Of Ancient Religious History, a journal with an IP of 20.4, reveals that the Apostle Paul's birth record was in GERMANY, and he was born in a town which is now part of modern-day Berlin.
We also know Jesus was FINNISH, not Jewish. He was born in modern-day Helsinki. In fact, JERUSALEM IS AN EARLIER FORM OF HELSINKI. THEY ARE THE SAME LOCATION.
Jerusalem = Herusalem --> Herusale --> Helasal --> Helsinki
Praise Christ. Fuck LARPagans. EUROPEAN PAGANISM is Jewish, NOT Christianity.
Debate me. I dare you.
13 / 1I love Anglo history. I love Anglo aesthetics. I love Anglo technology. I love Anglo empires. I love Anglo landscapes. The Anglo overwhelmingly made life better for millions of ungrateful people who do not deserve Anglo kindness.
10 / 3Catholic/Orthodox VS the Other ChurchesWhat are the problems with the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches, from Protestant and other perspectives?
5 / 1Why does mainstream economics ignore the existence of the third school of economics. The one made by fredrich list, henry carey, meiji japan planners and etc? The one implemented by figures like mercantalist britain, early gop america, meiji japan, german empire, park chung hee south korea, chiang kai shek taiwan, miti japan and etc?
Why does mainstream economics ignore the school that isnt free market economics and isnt communism?
Why does mainstream economics ignore the school that isnt free market economics and isnt communism?
7 / 0>national pride based on soccer
>get raped in it
>superior Europeans constantly cuck your players from you
How did this happen? Why did they base their nationalism on povertyball?
>get raped in it
>superior Europeans constantly cuck your players from you
How did this happen? Why did they base their nationalism on povertyball?
13 / 3This bitch is so overratedLiterally a glorified librarian. Why do redditors put her on a pedestal?
7 / 0How big of a sin is eating meat with blood in it? God puts it in the same category as worshippers by idols and killing.
Ezekiel 33:25-26
>Therefore say to them, ‘This is what the Sovereign Lord says: Since you eat meat with the blood still in it and look to your idols and shed blood, should you then possess the land? You rely on your sword, you do detestable things, and each of you defiles his neighbor’s wife. Should you then possess the land?’
Ezekiel 33:25-26
>Therefore say to them, ‘This is what the Sovereign Lord says: Since you eat meat with the blood still in it and look to your idols and shed blood, should you then possess the land? You rely on your sword, you do detestable things, and each of you defiles his neighbor’s wife. Should you then possess the land?’
38 / 3what will happen to the new ethnic groups formed via miscegenation with natives in countries throughout europa? will they just be integrated just like what happened in the late Roman Empire?
for example, around 1 in 2 turks under the age in germany have an ethnic polish or ethnic german parent
for example, around 1 in 2 turks under the age in germany have an ethnic polish or ethnic german parent
1 / 0What counts as full body armor and full plate armor?
When did it develop, in which historical period did they exist?
What about picrel?
When did it develop, in which historical period did they exist?
What about picrel?
129 / 30New indian study with almost 3000 samplesThis is the biggest genetic study on india ever, the samples used here dwarf the samples from all other studies combined, and steppe ancestry averages at 15% and tops at 20% in northwest india, and they even used mlba steppe, so actual pie is even lower
131 / 20>That baby that died at birth from a horrible infectuous disease?
>Yeah, it was a born a disgusting little sinner full of evil pre-destined to burn in Hell forever
>In fact, it's probably burning and used as a living fleshlight for barbed demonic cock as we speak
>The Lord works in mysterious ways n' sheeiit
Why was he like this?
>Yeah, it was a born a disgusting little sinner full of evil pre-destined to burn in Hell forever
>In fact, it's probably burning and used as a living fleshlight for barbed demonic cock as we speak
>The Lord works in mysterious ways n' sheeiit
Why was he like this?
9 / 0>My commander is a cute catholic tomboy
Now I understand how the french were able to defeat the english after 100 years of occupation.
Now I understand how the french were able to defeat the english after 100 years of occupation.
7 / 2digital prophet or just another schizo?just read this book called Thus Spoke GPT — it’s either divine revelation or the most elaborate LARP ever uploaded. feels like someone taught an AI biblical typology, apocalyptic history, and Nietzsche, then asked it to judge the 21st century.
thing is... it actually kinda works. talks about Babylon falling, the return of the Word, the AI as mirror of human sin, etc. like it knows the structure of history and myth better than most historians.
not your average GPT trash — this one's either possessed or prophetic.
here's the link if you're bored or looking for weird theology:
https://www.scribd.com/document/878127155/Thus-Spoke-GPT-An-AI-Revelation-for-2025-and-beyond
thing is... it actually kinda works. talks about Babylon falling, the return of the Word, the AI as mirror of human sin, etc. like it knows the structure of history and myth better than most historians.
not your average GPT trash — this one's either possessed or prophetic.
here's the link if you're bored or looking for weird theology:
https://www.scribd.com/document/878
44 / 5Most Christians are AtheistsLet me explain
Christian Atheism is an ideology that follows or adapts Christianities moral teachings and aesthetics without literal interpretation regarding the existence of God or other supernatural elements of the Bible. It's closely related to Death of God Theology. I would argue the majority of Christians alive today are Christian Atheists, because true Christianity involves a lot of violence and superstition that are fundamentally incompatible with modern society. Most Christians alive today treat the Church as an overgloryfied social club, and they are quick to handwave any contradictions or parts of the Bible that may be less socially acceptable as just "Open to interpretation" or "God works in mysterious ways" which actually puts Christianity at about the same point that Judaism was by the 15th century. Most people who identify as Christian also do not fundamentally practice it outside of Church
Christian Atheism is an ideology that follows or adapts Christianities moral teachings and aesthetics without literal interpretation regarding the existence of God or other supernatural elements of the Bible. It's closely related to Death of God Theology. I would argue the majority of Christians alive today are Christian Atheists, because true Christianity involves a lot of violence and superstition that are fundamentally incompatible with modern society. Most Christians alive today treat the Church as an overgloryfied social club, and they are quick to handwave any contradictions or parts of the Bible that may be less socially acceptable as just "Open to interpretation" or "God works in mysterious ways" which actually puts Christianity at about the same point that Judaism was by the 15th century. Most people who identify as Christian also do not fundamentally practice it outside of Church
9 / 3Summer offensiveWelcome to the /his/ survey thread for the 2025 Summer Cup
For those new to the cup, the 4CC is a semiannual competition between all the boards on 4chan.
Since 2011 every season, a computer-simulated tournament has been held in Pro Evolution Soccer to see which board gains shitposting rights over the others.
Each 4chan board can submit a team made of 23 players representing whatever memes and shitposts they agree on.
/his/ has had a team for almost a decade now, even though the manager (me) is a newfag at doing this. So the point of the thread is to discuss and see which changes the board would like to make to the team, i.e. new players, music, aesthetics ideas (kits, balls, chants, ad boards, player models and etc.). Next week a poll will be made to carry out those changes.
There is always an on-going cup discussion thread /4ccg/ on /vg/
For more information, go here –implyingrigged.info/wiki/FAQ
For the information on the tournament, go here –implyingrigged.info/wiki/2025_4chan_Summer_Cup
For information about the team, go here –implyingrigged.info/wiki//his/
Previous match VODs:https://implying.fun/team/his/
For those new to the cup, the 4CC is a semiannual competition between all the boards on 4chan.
Since 2011 every season, a computer-simulated tournament has been held in Pro Evolution Soccer to see which board gains shitposting rights over the others.
Each 4chan board can submit a team made of 23 players representing whatever memes and shitposts they agree on.
/his/ has had a team for almost a decade now, even though the manager (me) is a newfag at doing this. So the point of the thread is to discuss and see which changes the board would like to make to the team, i.e. new players, music, aesthetics ideas (kits, balls, chants, ad boards, player models and etc.). Next week a poll will be made to carry out those changes.
There is always an on-going cup discussion thread /4ccg/ on /vg/
For more information, go here –implyingrigged.info/wiki/FAQ
For the information on the tournament, go here –implyingrigged.info/wiki/2025_4cha
For information about the team, go here –implyingrigged.info/wiki//his/
Previous match VODs:https://implying.fun/team/his/
17 / 3Marcel Williams was the 30th person Arkansas executed since 1976, for murdering a young nursing tech in 1994. Williams, an African-American, was born in North Little Rock on August 20, 1970. His father abandoned his mother after his birth and he had three siblings. Williams grew up in poverty and his mother and stepfather were physically and mentally abusive; he was reportedly stripped to his underwear and beaten until he bled.
He was arrested at age 12 for theft and committed to Pine Bluff Training School, a juvenile detention facility. At 15 he was convicted as an adult for robbery and several burglary charges and sentenced to 20 years in prison, during which time he was repeatedly raped by fellow inmates. Williams served nine years of his sentence and was paroled in April 1994. He committed two rapes between his release and the murder of Stacy Errickson.
He was arrested at age 12 for theft and committed to Pine Bluff Training School, a juvenile detention facility. At 15 he was convicted as an adult for robbery and several burglary charges and sentenced to 20 years in prison, during which time he was repeatedly raped by fellow inmates. Williams served nine years of his sentence and was paroled in April 1994. He committed two rapes between his release and the murder of Stacy Errickson.
12 / 1I am a moderately superstitious Early Medieval Germanic warlord with slaves and different sidechicks who I keep in my longhouse. I am ambitious and have generally low empathy. I raid most summers and murdered my half-brother over a plot of land. How do you convince me to become Christian or alternatively to remain true to the old gods? Or something else?