>>40306502
>>40309156
>lottery numbers
You are doing nothing but displaying your own ignorance. It doesn't work that way, and it's obviously in the name 'single-bit'. The energy and engineering just for a single electron is barely workable as it is.

Also it would be harder to limit, read, and error-correct the potential return of multiple infinite electrons even if you tried, increasing the danger exponentially with each bit added.

There are ways you could use single-bit to make money, (which have been tested), but the fucking lottery pales in comparison not only to other methods, but the actual cost of doing it in the first place.

You'd know this if you actually knew what you were talking about. Which is how I know you don't. Those that do understand though and are remaining silent do need to know that I do know, and that my warning is real. DO NOT tempt fate any further. You may THINK you know what you're doing, but I can practically guarantee you are nowhere near our level of understanding, and it was only really out of sheer dumb luck we avoided total catastrophe so far. Remember you don't even need an actual infinite return to get an effectively catastrophic result as far as humanity is concerned. So even if you could limit the number of electrons to a finite number, you will probably not avoid energy levels you are simply not expecting or prepared for.

We got away with it once, and that's the ONLY reason our subsequent returns have been more limited. How long the underlying probabilities will be in our favour only time will tell, but catastrophe is inevitable at this point. I am doing my best to delay it as long as possible, and maybe another solution can be found in the meantime, but we cannot afford for anyone else to either add to the risk, or make a first uninformed attempt at all. So believe me when I say UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES ATTEMPT THIS EXPERIMENT. It's just not worth it, and sure as fuck not to win the lottery.